Giorgio Cittadini wrote:
> RESOLVED!!!
Congratulations!
And thanks for posting the fix.
Mac
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Lar
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Franz L. Kuhlmann
wrote:
> Hi, here is what I have done (on my UBUNTU 11.04 host, which has
> build-essential installed, and is meeting "lfs 6.8 host system requirements"
Hey, China called you earlier, they wanted their wall back. Next time,
just post the tail en
Hi, here is what I have done (on my UBUNTU 11.04 host, which has
build-essential installed, and is meeting "lfs 6.8 host system requirements"
lfs@ubuntulu:/mnt/lfs/sources$ tar -jxf gcc-4.5.2.tar.bz2
lfs@ubuntulu:/mnt/lfs/sources$ cd gcc-4.5.2
lfs@ubuntulu:/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-4.5.2$ tar -jxf ..
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:31:06 +0200
Giorgio Cittadini wrote:
> (5) But also if I manually modify grub.cfg introducing the new
> menuentry (and, obviously, I don't use grub-mkconfig), nothing
> changes.
Then you are not modifying the grub.cfg that grub (the one on the MBR)
is using. You have sever
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:31 +0200, Giorgio Cittadini wrote:
> Could there be a bug in the tarball of grub? I don't think it
> possible, since the other OSs do use grub2 successfully (one in the
> 1.98, the other in the 1.99 version).
Not likely, since it's the same tarball that works fine for ever
RESOLVED!!!
The error was that I wrote the new menuentries in grub.cfg under the
voice ###BEGIN /usr/etc/grub.d/40_custom, while it was necessary to
write them under the voice ###BEGIN /usr/etc/grub.d/10_linux.
This recognized it was very easy to get a multiboot "LFS | ArchLinux |
Ubuntu-Plus-7 | W
