Simon Geard wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Webmaster wrote:
>>> I never "check", because if the check passed it's useless but if the
>>> check failed you can do nothing.
>> Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
>> many a manager say more o
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:12 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Webmaster wrote:
> > I never "check", because if the check passed it's useless but if the
> > check failed you can do nothing.
>
> Then you do not understand the purpose of testing. I've heard
> many a manager say more or less the same thing
