On Saturday 30 April 2011 01:11:01 Simon Geard wrote:
> Andrew's post is missing a newline, I think. It's actually two rules:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", ACTION=="add",
> MODE="0644",
> RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start"
>
> and
>
> KERNEL=="rtc", ACTION=="add",
> MODE="0644",
> RU
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 14:04 -0400, Neal Murphy wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2011 12:42:47 Andrew Benton wrote:
> > SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", ACTION=="add", MODE="0644",
> > RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start" KERNEL=="rtc", ACTION=="add",
> > MODE="0644", RUN+="/etc/rc.d/init.d/setclock start"
>
> This
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:22 AM, bsquared wrote:
>
> At what step are the rules installed? I could not locate 50*, 55*
> above in /etc. /etc/udev/rules.d has contains two files
> (70-persistent*.rules). Did I miss an instruction?
I see that I did. I some how missed the instuctions after comp
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> It seems that /dev/rtc0 is matching this rule in 50-udev-default.rules
> which is why it's making the symlink:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="rtc", DRIVERS=="rtc_cmos", SYMLINK+="rtc"
>
> The question is, why doesn't it match the 55-lfs.rules:
>
> SUBSYSTE
On Friday 29 April 2011 12:42:47 Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:57:54 -0700
>
> bsquared wrote:
> > > Yes, I rebooted and checked /dev/rtc is a link to /dev/rtc0 which
> > > matches kernel config.
> > > --
> > > Thank you,
> > > -Brian
> >
> > On re-reading my last message wasn'
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:57:54 -0700
bsquared wrote:
> > Yes, I rebooted and checked /dev/rtc is a link to /dev/rtc0 which
> > matches kernel config.
> > --
> > Thank you,
> > -Brian
> >
> On re-reading my last message wasn't very clear. Yes I have the rtc
> file, but the time is incorrrect. It
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:55 PM, bsquared wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>> Does /dev/rtc exist on your system? As Andy said, setclock is run by
>> udev. It's been that way in LFS since May, 2009 (revision 8902). We are
>> now at revision 9518.
>>
>> -- Bruce
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 20:30 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> According to 55-lfs.rules udev should run the setclock script
> when /dev/rtc becomes available. Does /dev/rtc exist? Maybe you
> configured your kernel without real time clock support?
Really? I can't say I've noticed any problems, but it'
