Re: kernel section mismatch warning, can't find patch

2011-04-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
bsquared wrote: > Hello; > I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for > two, but I am not finding any for this one. > > LD drivers/built-in.o > WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in > reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() t

kernel section mismatch warning, can't find patch

2011-04-17 Thread bsquared
Hello; I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for two, but I am not finding any for this one. LD drivers/built-in.o WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() to the function .init.text:plat

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/17/2011 01:31 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > > Anyway, udev starts 4th in the startup scripts, it runs across a uevent > that uses a rule found in /usr, and it fails to create the device node. Errit creates the device node, but fails to run whatever program in /usr that is required to make it w

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/17/2011 03:34 AM, Simon Geard wrote: > On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:26 -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: >> Ahh...lightbulb. This is why we currently have the udev-retry in our >> bootscripts. Are the ids files accessed directly by external programs or >> by the utility libraries/programs? Provide a common

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-17 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:04:53 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > This is an interesting comment: > > "If we stop supporting /usr on a separate partition, it > entirely removes the need for /usr." > I think that the idea of doing away with /usr and just installing everything into / is interesting as it

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-17 Thread Simon Geard
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:56 -0400, Neal Murphy wrote: > Gently illuminating a point that does not necessarily invalidate your whole > argument: pci.ids and the IDs used in drivers are not necessarily in sync. > Udev should depend solely on the IDs compiled into the drivers; it can easily > obtai

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-17 Thread Simon Geard
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:26 -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > Ahh...lightbulb. This is why we currently have the udev-retry in our > bootscripts. Are the ids files accessed directly by external programs or > by the utility libraries/programs? Provide a common library to access > the files (if not done al