Re: Kernel options help

2011-04-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Dave Hajoglou wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Dave Hajoglou wrote: >> To list, >>I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some >> slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host >> (5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues until I try to

Re: Kernel options help

2011-04-14 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:13:06AM -0600, Dave Hajoglou wrote: > To list, > I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some > slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host > (5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues until I try to > configure a pac

Re: Kernel options help

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Hajoglou
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Dave Hajoglou wrote: > To list, >    I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some > slowness.  I built an x86_64 kernel  (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host > (5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon.  It boots with no issues until I try to > configure a package.  As

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-14 Thread Mike McCarty
Simon Geard wrote: [...] > While not universal, there seems to be a growing feeling that having a > separate /usr partition serves no useful purpose these days. The third > of those links gives a pretty good summary of that viewpoint. Well, I also have read this argument, and it cuts no water wi

Kernel options help

2011-04-14 Thread Dave Hajoglou
To list, I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host (5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues until I try to configure a package. As an example, if I run the ./configure for the openssh package, i

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Geard
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 19:55 +1200, Simon Geard wrote: > While not universal, there seems to be a growing feeling that having a > separate /usr partition serves no useful purpose these days. The third > of those links gives a pretty good summary of that viewpoint. Actually, some of them are going

Re: Incompatibility of udev and /usr

2011-04-14 Thread Simon Geard
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 21:04 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote: > There is an incompatibility with using udev and /usr being a > separate file system, which users of LFS need to be aware of. > It is presently not possible, in general, to use udev and have > /usr be a separately mounted file system. This is