Re: Should xz-utils installed before man-db

2011-01-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
xinglp wrote these words on 01/04/11 10:49 CST: > It seems that man-db depends on xz-utils. > > The configure out puts below > > 111 checking for pic... pic > 112 checking for gzip... gzip > 113 checking for compress... no > 114 checking for bzip2... bzip2 > 115 checking for xz... xz > 116 checki

Should xz-utils installed before man-db

2011-01-04 Thread xinglp
It seems that man-db depends on xz-utils. The configure out puts below 111 checking for pic... pic 112 checking for gzip... gzip 113 checking for compress... no 114 checking for bzip2... bzip2 115 checking for xz... xz 116 checking for gzopen in -lz... yes -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/

Re: failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1 on LFS (SVN-20101110)?

2011-01-04 Thread Shawn Dooley
Found this reply at the url below, just wanted to make the response easy to find. http://www.mail-archive.com/lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org/msg14651.html Sometimes it's the host OS and sometimes the HW and sometimes a newer compiler than the tests expect. Generally, they are timing issues a