pieter blomme wrote:
> Being pretty new to LFS, it's high chance I fucked up somewhere. But up
> till now everything seemed to work.
>
> When i try to apply the patch
> patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.5.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch
>
> while being in the gcc-directory, i get the following error:
>
> patchin
Being pretty new to LFS, it's high chance I fucked up somewhere. But up
till now everything seemed to work.
When i try to apply the patch
patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.5.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch
while being in the gcc-directory, i get the following error:
patching file gcc/gcc.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 6370
On 12/17/2010 12:48 PM, JimD. wrote:
>>
>>
>> Now that I have a bare-bones LFS (6.7) system running, I've begun to use it
>> to learn the rudiments of kernel module programming, using the Linux Kernel
>> Programming Guide (May 2007) as a guide. But the "Hello, World" project
>> fails to build, rig
>
>
> Now that I have a bare-bones LFS (6.7) system running, I've begun to use it
> to learn the rudiments of kernel module programming, using the Linux Kernel
> Programming Guide (May 2007) as a guide. But the "Hello, World" project
> fails to build, right off the bat. In case this is the right
ant...@turbopost.dk
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 12/16/2010 11:30 PM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:57 -0700, Daryl Lee wrote:
>> The rest, I have no clue about. Is there someone on this list who can point
>> me in the right direction? Is there a better forum to raise the question?
>
> Since you're working with the Linux Ke
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Harry Wei wrote:
>> Switching to a newer version of LFS would not hurt, either.
> You know, i want to get it well so that i can do 6.7 :)
Thing is, you can just switch to 6.7 right now, just get the new
packages, reconfigure the LFS account, and remove and recreate
