Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread Simon Geard
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 20:40 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii. Just a reminder, Bruce - pages are only numbered on the page itself, not in the table of contents. Referring to the "Host System Requirements" page is somewhat clearer th

Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread robert
Andre Keller wrote: > Am 25.11.2010 03:48, schrieb robert: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii. >>> >>>-- Bruce >>> >> section vii. chapter vii.?? >> > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.

Re: Wrong Links in tetex-3.0

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andre Keller wrote: > Hi > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/tetex.html > > list incorrect download links... > > the correct ones would be: > ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/teTeX/teTeX-3.0/distrib/tetex-src-3.0.tar.gz > ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/teTeX/teTeX-3.0/distrib/tet

Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
robert wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> - wiped all the directories clean ... tools/ & sources/ >>> - fresh extract of binutils from within /mnt/lfs/sources/ >>> - moved into newly-created binutils-2.20.1 directory >>> - $mkdir ../binutils-build >>> - $cd ../binutils-build >>> >>> prepared for comp

Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread Andre Keller
Am 25.11.2010 03:48, schrieb robert: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Your host is missing required packages. Run the script in section vii. >> >>-- Bruce >> > section vii. chapter vii.?? > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.

Wrong Links in tetex-3.0

2010-11-24 Thread Andre Keller
Hi http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/pst/tetex.html list incorrect download links... the correct ones would be: ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/teTeX/teTeX-3.0/distrib/tetex-src-3.0.tar.gz ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/teTeX/teTeX-3.0/distrib/tetex-texmf-3.0.tar.gz ftp://tug.org/hist

Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread robert
Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> - wiped all the directories clean ... tools/ & sources/ >> - fresh extract of binutils from within /mnt/lfs/sources/ >> - moved into newly-created binutils-2.20.1 directory >> - $mkdir ../binutils-build >> - $cd ../binutils-build >> >> prepared for compilation >> - $../binuti

Re: binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
> - wiped all the directories clean ... tools/ & sources/ > - fresh extract of binutils from within /mnt/lfs/sources/ > - moved into newly-created binutils-2.20.1 directory > - $mkdir ../binutils-build > - $cd ../binutils-build > > prepared for compilation > - $../binutils-2.20.1/configure \ >

binutils "make" ... no go

2010-11-24 Thread robert
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:21:14PM -0600, amalafrida wrote: >> make yields the following message ... should I be concerned? >> >> ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: error: 'LANG_TYPE' undeclared (first >> use in this function) >> ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: warning: comparis

Re: make exit code

2010-11-24 Thread Andre Keller
Am 25.11.2010 02:41, schrieb robert: > What, in general, should I expect from "make" command? A success > notification? nope > Exit code 0? yes > How about this ... fatal? > yes > make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po' > make[3]: Nothing to be done for `

make exit code

2010-11-24 Thread robert
What, in general, should I expect from "make" command? A success notification? Exit code 0? How about this ... fatal? make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `info'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/bfd/po'

Re: "make" error, of significance?

2010-11-24 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:21:14PM -0600, amalafrida wrote: > make yields the following message ... should I be concerned? > > ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: error: 'LANG_TYPE' undeclared (first > use in this function) > ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: warning: comparison is always true due >

"make" error, of significance?

2010-11-24 Thread amalafrida
make yields the following message ... should I be concerned? ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: error: 'LANG_TYPE' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../gcc-4.5.1/gcc/tree.h:5459: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type make[2]: *** [build/gencondmd.o] Error 1

Re: problem building at step 5.5.1

2010-11-24 Thread amalafrida
Just did it. Worked like a charm. Moving ahead now. Thanks very much for the help. I've repeated this step about 20 times today. Merci beaucoup. robert Bruce Dubbs wrote: > robert wrote: >> Arrived at step 5.5.1, Installation of Cross GCC. >> >> I am using "LFS-BOOK-6.7-HTML/chapter05/gcc-p

Re: problem building at step 5.5.1

2010-11-24 Thread amalafrida
I wrote a script to unpack them all at once from the /mnt/lfs/sources directory. So then, I am to assume that I should unpack them from within the gcc-4.5.1 directory. I assumed that the ../tar business was unpacking them from gcc-build directory. Will try that now. r. Bruce Dubbs wrote: >

Re: problem building at step 5.5.1

2010-11-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
robert wrote: > Arrived at step 5.5.1, Installation of Cross GCC. > > I am using "LFS-BOOK-6.7-HTML/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html" > > I have unpacked the mpfr, gmp, and mpc tarballs and renamed the > resulting directories as instructed What was your directory location when you unpacked the tarballs

problem building at step 5.5.1

2010-11-24 Thread robert
Arrived at step 5.5.1, Installation of Cross GCC. I am using "LFS-BOOK-6.7-HTML/chapter05/gcc-pass1.html" I have unpacked the mpfr, gmp, and mpc tarballs and renamed the resulting directories as instructed I created /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build directory then, cd /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build I issu