>> On 10/09/2009 09:39 PM, Alex wrote:
>> ...
>> If I correctly read the second (last) warning sentence,
>> would this mean that unless and until I upgrade Glibc
>> I have to stay with whatever '/usr/include/...' I sanitized
>> (make ... headers_install) with the kernel tarball I had
>> at the time
On 10/09/2009 09:39 PM, al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> The real confusion, in my case, is for people who'd like
> to go "beyond" the original LFS and, while not inclined
> to recompile/upgrade Glibc on each kernel point change,
> they still wish to keep up at least with the latest ker
Hi Everybody,
The "Kernel-2.6.x" installation instructions contain
a relatively dire Warning about the include headers
to be used during compilation.
While this warning has been the same for quite a while
(copied & pasted unchanged from one version to another)
and thus many people know it by heart
Baho Utot wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
>> multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
>> dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
>> goes? My friends accuse
Dan McGhee wrote:
> I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
> multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
> dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
> goes? My friends accuse me of being "rhetoric sensi
I have a Turion Dual Core Processer. I didn't not configure support for
multiprocessors when I did my new kernel and I load only one CPU. Is a
dual core processor a "multiprocessor" system as far as the linux kernel
goes? My friends accuse me of being "rhetoric sensitive." :)
Thanks,
Dan
--
