Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1

2009-08-28 Thread William Immendorf
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Hugh wrote: > Thus I recommend that you create the symlink. Unless you are doing multilib, which is recommened. William -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above informa

Re: LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1

2009-08-28 Thread Hugh
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 3:03 AM, ga ho wrote: > It states in chapter 5.4: > > If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the sanity of the toolchain: > > case $(uname -m) in >  x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;; > esac > > I just want to confirm. Do I still need to do

LFS 6.5 Chapter 5.4. Binutils-2.19.1 - Pass 1

2009-08-28 Thread ga ho
It states in chapter 5.4: If building on x86_64, create a symlink to ensure the sanity of the toolchain: case $(uname -m) in x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;; esac I just want to confirm. Do I still need to do this If I am building the 32 bit version of LFS on a 64bit