Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-03 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Michael Tsang wrote: > On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > >> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock: >> On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've >> no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, building multilib is very >> educational (when things go wrong). >>

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-03 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Ken Moffat wrote: > 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock: > >> All of this lib64 stuff has me wondering do I really need this? >> i.g. if I set the compiler flags to x86_64 will the system be x86_64 >> without the need for lib64's, or do I need the lib64's to work with >> things like firefox(prebuilt x

re. Village Idot question. How do I start? [LFS]

2009-08-03 Thread Robert A. Lerche
> I like the idea behind LFS and would like to explore all of the > options. LFS offers better control over the process. LFS is an excellent project and I think it will suit your needs as a starting point; as Ken Moffat points out, you will have some further work to do on cross-platform developme

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-03 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Michael Tsang wrote: > On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > >> 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock: >> On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've >> no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, building multilib is very >> educational (when things go wrong). >>

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-03 Thread Michael Tsang
On Monday 03 August 2009 20:04:16 Ken Moffat wrote: > 2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock : > On x86_64, I use "pure64". But then, I'm happy to use lilo and I've > no need of pre-built binaries. Certainly, building multilib is very > educational (when things go wrong). > > ĸen I always build "pure64" an

Re: creating ext4 filesystem for a new lfs build

2009-08-03 Thread Ken Moffat
2009/8/3 Justin P. Mattock : > All of this lib64 stuff has me wondering do I really need this? > i.g. if I set the compiler flags to x86_64 will the system be x86_64 > without the need for lib64's, or  do I need the lib64's to work with > things like firefox(prebuilt  x86_64)? > > Seems a bit faste

liveCD problem

2009-08-03 Thread 吴焱
I checkout from svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/livecd/trunk to make a LFS 6.4 liveCD. But it failed at "Building glibc-2.8-20080929 for target stage1". I checked the log of building glibc, and the last serval lines are as follow: cd /mnt/lfs/image/lfs-livecd/packages/glibc/glibc-build && /tools/bi