On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 02:09:51PM -0600, Trent Shea wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:19:56 stencil wrote:
>
> > Which is the better choice, -i or -s? And if it is to be
> > -i, is the LFS 4.4 procedure the best way of ensuring that
> > $LFS is set to /mnt/lfs, or should the $LFS specificat
On Thursday 16 April 2009 13:19:56 stencil wrote:
> Which is the better choice, -i or -s? And if it is to be
> -i, is the LFS 4.4 procedure the best way of ensuring that
> $LFS is set to /mnt/lfs, or should the $LFS specification be
> the *only* change made to root's native environment?
I don't
LFS Chapter 5.34 advises
## The commands in the remainder of this book
##must be performed while logged in as user root
## and no longer as user lfs. Also, double check
## that $LFS is set in root's environment.
The orthodox Ubuntu way of acting as root is to prepend
'sudo' to each command. I
Sorry this is longish, but I didn't want to post piecemeal
as I went, with "this failed" and what I did, then later
"oh, this failed, too" etc. Too much clutter.
Well, I have fiddled this and that, and somewhat gotten JHALFS
to work with the LiveCd as the host distribution. The first
hurdle is tha
First, I want to thank everyone involved in creating the LFS project.
It is a beautiful piece of software craftsmanship -- useful, elegant
and well documented.
I'm writing this post because I have a suggestion for the Live CD part
of the LFS project. I went back and read the Live CD mailing list
