hi,
i entered into the chroot environment and then i tried to install the
packages. but it shows the error:
root:~/linux-2.6.27.4# pwd
/root/linux-2.6.27.4
root:~/linux-2.6.27.4# make mrproper
make: gcc: Command not found
root:~/linux-2.6.27.4#
dont know how to proceed. help me in this issue.
N
rajesh britto wrote:
> /tools/bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries:
> libtermcap.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
>
> FYI,
> [r...@compute1 ~]# ldd /tools/bin/bash
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0x005a4000)
> libtermcap.so.2 => /tools/lib/
OK, Let's see if I can get this posted correctly.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>> They can't both be correct. The one in "stable" seems to match
>> the actual source file. The one in "development" seems wrong.
>
> Stable is correct. Development hasn't been updated in a while.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
>
> i'll explain why i NEVER will use any package-manager:
>
Looks like you have based your comments based primarily on package
management used by "binary distros". The features that you describe
are available in source based package distros s
Mike McCarty wrote:
[...]
> $ grep inetutils-1.5.tar.gz SHA1SUMS
> 825834b94cd387b2d088ef1cfe727de824b9589e inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
>
>
> $ sha1sum lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
> 825834b94cd387b2d088ef1cfe727de824b9589e lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
> $ sha1sum gnu-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
> 8
Tobias Gasser wrote:
>> A good package manager is, IMO, a necessity.
> NO
>
>
> i'll explain why i NEVER will use any package-manager:
The choices you make are of course your own. I would
not presume to tell you what you should do for your
own machine. I stated what I consider to be necessar
hi
i am working on LFS 6.4 version guide and completed till chapter
5. while i was trying chroot in the chapter 6 i was struck up with
errors. which i could not proceed further. i have send mails to the
LFS support but my mails are rejected (which i do know the reason). i
think u can help me
> A good package manager is, IMO, a necessity.
NO
i'll explain why i NEVER will use any package-manager:
have a look at the configure options with php5:
depending on what other packages i've alread installed, the php package
will contain the mcrypt/mhash ONLY IF NEEDED, same with mysql or
