Jeremy Henty wrote:
> I'd always taken it for granted that m4, autoconf, automake etc. had
> to be in LFS, but recently I thought "Hang on! The auto-tools are
> *development* tools, not build tools. Building auto-tooled software
> only requires a shell, make, sed etc. You don't need
Jeremy Henty wrote these words on 02/27/09 18:18 CST:
> So, since creating an LFS system only requires building existing
> software, why does it include the auto-tools? Could we not move them
> to BLFS? What am I missing here?
The 600 previous discussions about the same subject. Please re
I'd always taken it for granted that m4, autoconf, automake etc. had
to be in LFS, but recently I thought "Hang on! The auto-tools are
*development* tools, not build tools. Building auto-tooled software
only requires a shell, make, sed etc. You don't need autoconf and
friends unless
> > I'm going through Linux From Scratch v6.4, and I'm on Chapter 8.4.
> > Currently,
> I'm running Linux completely off of an external hard drive, while I'm also
> building my Linux From Scatch build onto a seperate partition on that disk.
> The
> laptop already has one hard drive in it, bu
Ken Moffat wrote:
> What results does your debian system produce for version-check from
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/hostreqs.html
> and how do they compare to the versions listed on that page ?
>
> In particular, which kernel and which compiler version was used to
>
Michael schrieb:
> I'm going through Linux From Scratch v6.4, and I'm on Chapter 8.4.
> Currently, I'm running Linux completely off of an external hard drive, while
> I'm also building my Linux From Scatch build onto a seperate partition on
> that disk. The laptop already has one hard drive in
