Hi Simon,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 21:15 -0500, alupu wrote:
>> - QUESTION
>> Does anybody know anything about the transition to 2.6.28 changing the
>> "view" of the system to a "Universal", "Uniform", "Consistent", "SATA
>> centric", etc.?
> Dis
Yea, it's okay to continue.
The error code was sort of captured during execution, but the -k flag
forced the compilation to continue through the error(s).
The test log files are provided in part to help assure LFS users
what's okay and to help developers with feature tracking (or something
like tha
The make -k check finished with an error code of 2 and stated cannot make
check-target.
However when I checked ../gcc-4.3.2/contrib/test_summary against the 073-gcc
test log file on the LFS website I had exactly the same passes, successes and
failures.
So could anyone confirm for sure that it
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 21:15 -0500, alupu wrote:
> - QUESTION
> Does anybody know anything about the transition to 2.6.28 changing the
> "view" of the system to a "Universal", "Uniform", "Consistent", "SATA
> centric", etc.?
>
> Any words, details, etc. which can shed some light on this strange
> p
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 01:50 +0800, mobile Parmenides wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am reading stable lfs book of 6.3 version. On page 96, I'm
> puzzled to the following two commands:
>
> ln -sv ../usr/bin/cpp /lib
> ln -sv gcc /usr/bin/cc
>
> For the first com
