Re: I DID IT...

GMail wrote: > Finally... > > This monster that has been eating my time and patience is up. > > IPL'd my version of LFS at 20:00...woohoo. Initial Program Load! Congrats! > Now whats nextNASA? Just one step at a time, and you'll get there! Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";

I DID IT...

Finally... This monster that has been eating my time and patience is up. IPL'd my version of LFS at 20:00...woohoo. Now whats nextNASA? rp -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information

Re: Bash Shell Startup Files..

LANG= _.<@modifiers> ll = language (ie. en for english) CC=country (ie. CA for Canada) charmap=character map (ie. iso88591) @modifiers=modifiers( ie. @euro if you need it, omit if you don't) So, as example: en_CA.iso88591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rob Ralph Porter wote: > Folks, > > I read and re-read

Re: shadow-4.1.2.1 man pages

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:01:28PM +0100, Juan A. Moreno wrote: > On Monday 03 November 2008 20:08:12 Randy McMurchy wrote: > > Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST: > > > What man pages are better? > > > > I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use > > ma

Re: hal start fails

On Monday 03 November 2008 05:44, DJ Lucas wrote: > >> 20:18:16.891 [D] util_helper.c:124: drop_privileges: could not set group > >> id > > > > Does the haldaemon user and group exist? Yes. User haldaemon UID 19, Gruppe haldaemon GID 19 > > Also: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] xterm-237]# ls -ld /var/cach

Bash Shell Startup Files..

Folks, I read and re-read the instructions in 7.9 and I'm lost. I understand ll=en beyond that, im lost. export LANG=_.<@modifiers> Just need good old US english with maybe a republican modifier (joke) thanks in advance rp -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: ht

Re: shadow-4.1.2.1 man pages

On Monday 03 November 2008 20:08:12 Randy McMurchy wrote: > Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST: > > What man pages are better? > > I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use > man pages from the native package rather than the generic ones from > the man-

Re: kernel configuration and installation

> That implies you are using LFS-6.2. I'm afraid I think glibc-2.3.6 > is now regarded as "very old". > > I don't know what to recommend - LFS-6.3 is about to become "old", > hopefully within the next 3 weeks, but as I said in a different > thread I expect there to be a *lot* of breakage with t

Re: shadow-4.1.2.1 man pages

Juan A. Moreno wrote these words on 11/03/08 12:52 CST: > What man pages are better? I would prefer to use the Shadow man pages. IMO, it's better to use man pages from the native package rather than the generic ones from the man-pages package. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld vers

shadow-4.1.2.1 man pages

Hi. I am building the current svn version of LFS (20081031). The shadow-4.1.2.1 package wants to install the passwd.5 and getspnam.3 man pages, already installed by the man-pages-3.11 package. What man pages are better? If we prefer the version of the man-pages-3.11 package, we can use commands

Re: Swapon not working

> Hello, this really does sound like it isn't enabled in your kernel. > The option is CONFIG_SWAP, or under the name "Support for paging of > anonymous memory (swap)". > > > zgrep CONFIG_SWAP /proc/config.gz ( or substitute grep and your > .config if you didn't create /proc/config.gz ) > > > >

Re: GCC Test Failure

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:42:39AM -0800, Rob Thornton wrote: > This is my third time through LFS and I always receive the following > failure in the GCC tests in chapter 6.12 within the 'gcc Summary': > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fastcall-sseregparm.c execution test > > # of expected passes

Re: missing libgtkembedmoz.so

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 08:01:57PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 19:53 -0700, Dennis J Perkins wrote: > > I've discovered that libgtkembemoz.so is not being built by Firefox 3. > > Yelp and monodevelop both want it. Does anyone know how to get it built > > and installed? > > >

GCC Test Failure

This is my third time through LFS and I always receive the following failure in the GCC tests in chapter 6.12 within the 'gcc Summary': FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fastcall-sseregparm.c execution test # of expected passes38984 # of unexpected failures 1 # of expected failures 99 # of unt

Re: hal start fails

After recompiling hal-0.5.9.1 and rebooting, I get slightly different results calling hald: quote --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes 12:35:25.665 [I] hald.c:529: hal 0.5.9.1 12:35:25.665 [I] hald.c:594: Will not daemonize 12:35:25.665 [I]