Richard Melville wrote:
>> Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
>> headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
>> changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
>> that, we *don't* support upgrading glibc - when the time comes,
>>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:25:38PM +0100, Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There seems to be a problem building the last version of dvd+rw-tools
> (7.0) with the most recent kernels (headers ?) :
>
> root [ /sources/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 ]# make all rpl8 btcflash
> make[1]: entrant dans le répertoire
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:11:35PM +, Richard Melville wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
> > headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
> > changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
> > that, we *don't*
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Rob Thornton wrote:
> > There is a bug in GCC 4.3.2 which will cause tests to fail if the system
> > has a stack size of 8MB or less in limits-structnest.c
> > (gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp for example). The devs are aware of
> > the problem and are working on a f
Sorry if I wasn't entirely clear, but it is libcap that wont build on my LFS
system at all. Patched vsftpd works like a charm.
Thanks for the help!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informatio
Rob Thornton wrote:
> There is a bug in GCC 4.3.2 which will cause tests to fail if the system
> has a stack size of 8MB or less in limits-structnest.c
> (gcc.c-torture/compile/compile.exp for example). The devs are aware of
> the problem and are working on a fix but may be worth mentioning in
Rodolfo
No, the error I reported should only effect the test suite, and is a
regression in 4.3.2.
It is also recommended that you do not set any environmental variables
for optimizing the toolchain if you don't know exactly what you're doing
as the minimal speed gains are outweighed by the pot
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:25:38 +0100, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I still don't know how to make a patch, I can't be
> more specific
Nicolas,
Here's how to create a patch:
tar xf dvd+rw-tools-7.0.tar.gz
cp -a dvd+rw-tools-7.0 dvd+rw-tools-7.0.orig
cd dvd+rw-tools-7.0
#make you
Hi.
There seems to be a problem building the last version of dvd+rw-tools
(7.0) with the most recent kernels (headers ?) :
root [ /sources/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 ]# make all rpl8 btcflash
make[1]: entrant dans le répertoire « /sources/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 »
gcc -O2 -D_REENTRANT -c -o growisofs.o growiso
> Yes, I think you've missed the important thing ;) The kernel
> headers are what glibc was compiled against, and they should not be
> changed unless you upgrade glibc [ and before anyone misconstrues
> that, we *don't* support upgrading glibc - when the time comes,
> build a new system ].
>
>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:59:40AM +0100, giuseppe marchi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i'm using a 32 bit kernal version on fedora 9.
> I applayed the bash patch on chatper 5.
> I found that the libraries referenced by tic contains the requested symbol
> _nc_check_termtype2.
> Can you give me more details ab
Hi,
i'm using a 32 bit kernal version on fedora 9.
I applayed the bash patch on chatper 5.
I found that the libraries referenced by tic contains the requested symbol
_nc_check_termtype2.
Can you give me more details about the problems involving bash and ncurses.
Thanks.
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
