> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:07:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
>> from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo"
>> and makes it the primary group of user "foo". It this meant to
>> happen or hav
satish patel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Anybosy have idea about creating Own bootable and installable linux distro
> linux ubunt and redhat etc.. I have created LFS and I want to put it all on
> one CD so anytime I can install that linux on my PC not need to build
> everytime, anyone have idea about
Em Monday 29 September 2008 09:47:35 Jeremy Henty escreveu:
> Replying to myself,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:07:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> > I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
> > from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo"
> > a
Replying to myself,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:07:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
> from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo"
> and makes it the primary group of user "foo". It this meant t
You could create a livecd with a tarball of the root filesystem, assuming you
want those packages installed and configured exactly the way they are on your
current system.
Dan
Computer Systems Manager
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sa
I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS
from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo" and
makes it the primary group of user "foo". It this meant to happen or
have I messed something up?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
