Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread Thomas Seeling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 J. Greenlees schrieb: |>> It's usually recommended to use CLFS for building 64 bit right now. apart from the bootloader issue (where I had loved to at least read a comment ~ in the book that grub currently does not work) my amd64 build went smoothly w

Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread James Harrison
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 08:52 +0100, Michael Kearns wrote: > Hi, > > Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a > couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) > LiveCD, and followed the latest development book. > > I downloaded all of the latest t

Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread Michael Kearns
James Harrison wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 08:52 +0100, Michael Kearns wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a >> couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) >> LiveCD, and followed the latest development book. >> >

Re: Flex-2.5.34

2008-04-07 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > The flex version present in the SVN LFS book has some compatibility > problem with old lex. Or, to be more precise (if I understood the message > I wrote clearly), the previous versions of flex did not halt on

Re: Flex-2.5.34

2008-04-07 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote: > Hi. > > The flex version present in the SVN LFS book has some compatibility > problem with old lex. Or, to be more precise (if I understood the message > I wrote clearly), the previous versions of flex did not halt on > incompatib

Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread J. Greenlees
Michael Kearns wrote: > J. Greenlees wrote: > >> Michael Kearns wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a >>> couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) >>> LiveCD, and followed the latest development boo

Flex-2.5.34

2008-04-07 Thread Nicolas FRANCOIS
Hi. The flex version present in the SVN LFS book has some compatibility problem with old lex. Or, to be more precise (if I understood the message I wrote clearly), the previous versions of flex did not halt on incompatible options of lex, while the 2.5.34 version produces an error. Some examples

Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread Michael Kearns
J. Greenlees wrote: > Michael Kearns wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a >> couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) >> LiveCD, and followed the latest development book. >> >> > It's usually recommended

Re: stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread J. Greenlees
Michael Kearns wrote: > Hi, > > Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a > couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) > LiveCD, and followed the latest development book. > It's usually recommended to use CLFS for building 64 bit right now.

stubs-32.h missing

2008-04-07 Thread Michael Kearns
Hi, Having decided to have another go at LFS (been through the process a couple of times before, a few years back), I grabbed the 6.3 (amd64) LiveCD, and followed the latest development book. I downloaded all of the latest tool sources and patches (would be great to have a txt file on those pa