On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The command covers all the arches we currently support: x86 and x86_64
> for Linux. We really don't need to be adjusting the default specs for
> GNU mach. It definitely works, but you can fool around with it
> yourself if you'd like
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the
> book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I
> found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for
> fi
Hi all,
I'm wondering how good is the job done by the specs commands in the
book. At first I compared the commands to the former specs patch. I
found that it did less than the patch. The commands didn't check for
files with the name 'gnu.h' and some header files in other
architectures like 'sysv4.
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>> * Does the community still want the LiveCD project? (Consider that a
>> couple of the arguments above imply that the LFS LiveCD by its nature is
>> degrading the quality of LFS)
>>
>> * If so, is the community prepared to lend help in keep
