On Sunday 02 September 2007 10:42, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> 2. is a little more sensible to me, but only because I know
> of a very simple way to create the markers.
I like that; a lot more flexible than my initial idea of copying the
running script, doing a sed, and then running the new script.
T
On 9/2/07, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:45, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > It depends what you do with your script and if you keep some kind of
> > progress marker so that the newly invoked script knows where to pick
> > up.
> That's going to be the tricky part.
On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:45, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> It depends what you do with your script and if you keep some kind of
> progress marker so that the newly invoked script knows where to pick
> up.
That's going to be the tricky part. The only ideas I've had so far are:
1. Somehow pause the
Alan wrote:
> -bash-3.1$ locate libpam | tail
> /usr/lib/libpam.la
> /usr/lib/libpam.so
> /usr/lib/libpamc.la
> /usr/lib/libpamc.so
> /usr/lib/libpam_misc.la
> /usr/lib/libpam_misc.so
Seems to me that libpam.so is just a symlink to the actual library,
which doesn't show up in your locate commmand
On 9/2/07, Boovarahan (Sridhar) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> lfs live cd rc2032 - chapter 6.4 "entering the chroot environment -
> command "chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
> PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
> /tools/bin/bash --login +h"
On 9/2/07, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:00, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > That's fine. I use the temp bash all the time to do the final build.
> That's good to hear; the only difference I noticed was that the second
> bash was compiled to use the readline we ins
On Sunday 02 September 2007 07:42, Boovarahan (Sridhar) wrote:
> Plz help me to proceed further.
Did you deviate from the book at all? Like, trying to use a link
at /mnt/lfs/tools?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubs
On Sunday 02 September 2007 08:00, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> That's fine. I use the temp bash all the time to do the final build.
That's good to hear; the only difference I noticed was that the second
bash was compiled to use the readline we install in chapter 6, and I
wasn't sure if anything depend
On 9/1/07, Trent Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of any problems that could creep in if I
> skip "exec /bin/bash --login +h" and continuing to use the bash built
> in chapter 5 until I'm done chapter 6? I ask because I have no idea how
> to pass control of a running script to the
Hi !
lfs live cd rc2032 - chapter 6.4 "entering the chroot environment -
command "chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM="$TERM" PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash --login +h"
gives the following msg:
chroot: cannot run command `/tools/bin
10 matches
Mail list logo