uuuh!!!, my new shiny LFS (by hand no automatic tool) system is
ready!!!, thank you very much fo such a great book, I follow they
instructions one by one and I don't have any problem, the book don't
have even a typo bug.
...now to read and follow BFLS book...my new system have only a basic
On 6/9/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:23:19PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> >
> > It can build GCC fine, I've builded a complete GCC package (Including
> > ada, fortran,...) lately, I just didn't run GCC testsuite completely,
> > but compiling and installing works
On 6/8/07, Tijnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Jonathan Haws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When trying to install the Glibc headers in LFS there are numerous issues.
> > First, make -k check produces quite a few errors (I will post them all once
> > I run the test again). Most are
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:23:19PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
>
> It can build GCC fine, I've builded a complete GCC package (Including
> ada, fortran,...) lately, I just didn't run GCC testsuite completely,
> but compiling and installing works fine, and gcc works fine now :)
>
Oh, I misunderstood.
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 02:17:21PM -0600, Jonathan Haws wrote:
>
> I decided to continue when I read about not worrying about nptl, so the next
> step is to run:
>
> make install
>
> When this is run, it fails at the end with these messages:
>
> make[2]: Entering directory '/build/gclibc-2.3.6
On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have run modprobe for the modules I know are correct and I actually
> get output/feedback from.
> But when I run fdisk -l I get nothing still
>
> The only surefire way I know to get my hard drives working is to compile
> every
On 6/8/07, Jonathan Haws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When trying to install the Glibc headers in LFS there are numerous issues.
> First, make -k check produces quite a few errors (I will post them all once I
> run the test again). Most are nptl, which from what I have read are nothing
> to wo
On 6/8/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > On 6/8/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm currently at glibc-2.3.6, and I would love to upgrade it to
> > > > glibc-2.6,
> > >
> > > Why ? I've only built glibc-2.6 o
When trying to install the Glibc headers in LFS there are numerous issues.
First, make -k check produces quite a few errors (I will post them all once I
run the test again). Most are nptl, which from what I have read are nothing to
worry about. I am using the LiveCD as the host. Now down to
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm currently at glibc-2.3.6, and I would love to upgrade it to
> > > glibc-2.6,
> >
> > Why ? I've only built glibc-2.6 on ppc64, to see if it helped with
> > the showstopper gcc-4.2
> home, the entire computer slows to a deathly pace whenever the ethernet
> is plugged in. Unplug it and poof, xorg and the like runs great. Plug
I think XOrg is the clue. Have you added IPv6 addresses to /etc/hosts?
Something like:
# add myself to the known network hosts
192.168.1.110 pand
John Gnew wrote:
> Does anyone have a script that would read the MD5SUMS files and then
> verify the MD5s against each source file?
>
> John
Isn't this what "md5sum -c" does?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscrib
On 6/8/07, John Gnew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a script that would read the MD5SUMS files and then
> verify the MD5s against each source file?
>
> John
you don't need a script for that, the md5sum program can read the file
itself, i believe with the -c option, if not, see the m
On 6/8/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:46:11AM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > >
> > > Dan thinks minor glibc version upgrades (2.3.5 to 2.3.6, maybe 2.6
> > > to 2.6.1) are ok.
> >
> > Minor upgrades are more or less bug fixes right? So I think Dan is right.
> >
>
Does anyone have a script that would read the MD5SUMS files and then
verify the MD5s against each source file?
John
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 6/8/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:46:11AM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> > >
> > > Dan thinks minor glibc version upgrades (2.3.5 to 2.3.6, maybe 2.6
> > > to 2.6.1) are ok.
> >
> > Minor upgrades are more or less bug fixes right? So I think Dan is right.
> >
>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tijnema
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:46 AM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: Headers problems
On 6/7/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:23:33PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:46:11AM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> >
> > Dan thinks minor glibc version upgrades (2.3.5 to 2.3.6, maybe 2.6
> > to 2.6.1) are ok.
>
> Minor upgrades are more or less bug fixes right? So I think Dan is right.
>
In theory, yes they are bug fixes. In practice, I wouldn't w
On 6/7/07, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:23:33PM +0200, Tijnema wrote:
> >
> > Ok, thanks you both for your replies, i would expect the headers to be
> > upgraded together with the kernel.
>
> No! Please, repeat after me:
> **Only upgrade the headers if you up
19 matches
Mail list logo
