On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:51PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 4/13/07, yayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ken wrote:
> >
> > >all the later packages are free to install pages from
> > >man-pages."
> >
> > well, then this make confusion in my head! (O_o!)
> >
> > (I suppose you didn't notice
On 4/13/07, yayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken wrote:
>
> >all the later packages are free to install pages from
> >man-pages."
>
> well, then this make confusion in my head! (O_o!)
>
> (I suppose you didn't notice on my previous email that
> I was referring to that package management system. :
Ken wrote:
>No, all the later packages are free to install pages from
>man-pages.
[...]
>So, because the documentation from the packages is likely to be up
>to date (but items in 'c' above are not), the later packages can
>update man-pages as they choose.
err... stop! wait a minute!
confusion! (
hi,
i installed slim login manager recenlty.it has no dependencies on gnome and
kde libs and looks much better than xdm.However i have'nt been able to get
it working .
i have created a file /etc/rc.d/slim as per the slim manual which is as
follows:
#!/bin/sh
#
# /etc/rc.d/slim: start/stop slim
#
On 4/13/07, prdcomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Regarding the timing out, I've got one of the log files opened in front of me
> now. Will reproduce part of it - it indeed mentions "program timed out", but
> don't know what caused it, its relation with the failures etc:
>
> === libmudflap Summa
On 4/11/07, Sherzod Rakh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is file in lfs live cd root.ext2. How can i build like root.ext2 file
> my lfs system???
I didn't checked it out, so correct me if i'm wrong...
The root.ext2 file is a filesystem in a file, to create such system
you could use dd
dd if
that was the only error.repeating the command worked fine.
other instances of sudo and rm also worked fine.however i cant explain why
the error should have come in the first place.rm and sudo are pretty old
and should'nt have bugs ,right?
On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/
On 4/12/07, Carlos Mueses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi! i'm using a virtual machine (virtual pc) to build my LFS (mainly 'cause
> i've head stories of friends that have damaged several hard disk trying to
> it with a physical disk)i'm using the live cd to build my system with no
> distribu
hi,
i just built scilab .but on deleting the source tree i got this message:
/home/hackman/to-be-built sudo rm -r scilab-4.1
Segmentation fault
/home/hackman/to-be-built
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]@localdomain at Fri Apr 13 13:21:23 2007 ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel: Oops: [#1]
Message
>
> On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:37 PM, prdcomp wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> I even
> attempted different builds with gentoo safe and experimental
> optimizations. -O3 is death. -O2 is aright. -O is fine. I suggest
> defaults as the authors intended, and I don't suggest changing
> otherwise.
Humm. That
> On 4/12/07, prdcomp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>... the following flags: "-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp". Those are >rather
>common options, but the number of unexpected (and quite expected by >now)
>libmudflap failures raised from the traditional 6 to 320!
>
> That doesn't seem right. Those
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:37 PM, prdcomp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been building (again, after some time) lfs recently. Apart
> from a (solved) glibc testsuite doubt, everything seens to have
> gone well.
>
> So now I've searching about optmization options - including old lfs-
> support mail archiv
12 matches
Mail list logo
