On 27 Mar 2007, at 13:36, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 10:23 +0200, Tijnema ! wrote:
>>> I took the command located on the SourceForge page, and it does use
>>> -z3 :P
>>> I don't know if it is finished yet, because i'm on school n
This is probably dead now, but I was on vacation.
On 4/5/07, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 22:46 -0600, Dennis J Perkins wrote:
> > I'm not sure which program... gnome-mount, gnome-volume-manager, or
> > nautilus... is responsible for putting labels under drive ico
On Monday 09 April 2007 19:47:30 Jorge Almeida wrote:
> >>kfile_exr.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool
> >> KExrPlugin::readInfo(KFileMetaInfo&, uint)': kfile_exr.cpp:229: error:
> >> 'hasutcOffset' was not declared in this scope kfile_exr.cpp: At global
> >> scope:
> >>kfile_exr.cpp:16
Jeff wrote these words on 04/09/07 15:02 CST:
> /usr/bin/ld:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../libncurses.so: file
> fo rmat not recognized; treating as linker script
> /usr/bin/ld:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../libncurses.so:1:
> parse error
> collect2: ld returned 1 e
On 4/9/07, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am installing LFS 6.2 on a Via C7 based computer using the Livecd version
> 6.2-5.
>
> I am well into chapter 6. All sanity checks and compile checks have gone
> positively until I get to Procps-3.2.6. I get an error code 1 when I perform
> make.
I am installing LFS 6.2 on a Via C7 based computer using the Livecd version
6.2-5.
I am well into chapter 6. All sanity checks and compile checks have gone
positively until I get to Procps-3.2.6. I get an error code 1 when I perform
make. (I will list error below.) I compiled Sed, Libtool, Re
Just got back from vacation.
On 3/29/07, yayo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey Dan!
> guess what...?
> it works now! :D
That's great! Thanks very much for looking into this.
> look at this session. I've compiled and installed bison 2.2 and bash
> yesterday,
> before to go sleep, and I made this
On 4/8/07, Gerhard Ramsebner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let's assume I do not want udev to load certain kernel modules
> automatically. Is there a rule to exclude devices or a subsytem?
> I would be glad if someone could just drop a simple example.
Sort of. You can have udev ignore certain uev