On 9/12/06, Brandon Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
>The advice at the end of Ch. 6 is bogus.
Would you care to elaborate? Thx
A long standing hammering of /tools done in the toolchain readjustment.
When you finish Ch. 5, /tools is well fleshed out and the toolchain is
Dan Nicholson wrote:
The advice at the end of Ch. 6 is bogus.
--
Dan
--
Would you care to elaborate? Thx
-Brandon
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I checked that the version I am using is 5.2.1 from the
coreutils
package:
I see. Well I tried it with shadow's su because that's what we
use on the
finished LFS system. Could well be that coreutils' su doesn't
work
properly in this respect. You could try building shadow's su in
chapter 5.
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:24:48 +0300 "Angel Tsankov"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I checked that the version I am using is 5.2.1 from the coreutils
> package:
I see. Well I tried it with shadow's su because that's what we use on the
finished LFS system. Could well be that coreutils' su doesn't work
On Tue 12 Sep 2006 Dan Nicholson wrote:
> The alsa.dev script was used when hotplug and udev were installed
> together. Hotplug handled dynamic devices, and it would use the alsa
> script placed in /etc/dev.d. Nowadays, udev has completely deprecated
> hotplug to the point where any of the dynamic
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 03:32, mike wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i don't know if anyone can offer any help but i'm when i try in install
> texinfo-4.8 i'm getting
>
> undefined reference to 'tgetstr' undefined reference to 'tgetflag'
>
>
> error messages before make fails
What version of LFS bo
On Sunday 10 September 2006 09:59, Wei Chong wrote:
> src/su dummy -c "make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes check"
>
> the test fail with following error:
>
> Making check in lib
> /bin/sh: line 0: cd: lib: Not a directory
> make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
Does lib folder exist in coreutils-5.96 bui
On 9/12/06, Vladimir A. Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 04:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does anyone have a precompiled temporary toolchain so that i don't
> have to recompile over and over again?
In other words, you cannot just take somebody else's temporary
tool
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 04:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does anyone have a precompiled temporary toolchain so that i don't
> have to recompile over and over again?
The following is my own opinion.
1. Anything "precompiled" breaks the whole idea behind Linux From
Scratch.
2. Toolchain comp
