Re: cannot execute /bin/bash : No such file or Directory exists

yogesh prabhu wrote: Dear all, This is my first email to the groups with the error ... i am stuck atlast !! I had finished my LFS installation... compiled my kernel too... installed the grub then i rebooted with my beauty grub into my distro LFS 6.1 everything went well i g

cannot execute /bin/bash : No such file or Directory exists

Dear all, This is my first email to the groups with the error ... i am stuck atlast !! I had finished my LFS installation... compiled my kernel too... installed the grub then i rebooted with my beauty grub into my distro LFS 6.1 everything went well i got the login prompt to

Re: Upgrading udev on LFS-6.1.1

On 8/11/06, Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I run LFS-6.1.1 , upgraded to kernel-2.6.16.27 and udev-071 . Can I upgrade to udev-096 using the LFS-6.2 instructions or will it break horribly? I should disable hotplug as well, right? I see this was from a couple weeks ago, but I've been

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

lynx.abraxas wrote: Forgot to ask what gcc version You'd recommend for glibc, and wich for the kernel, and the rest? Should it all be compiled by the same version? I know 2.95 is not good anymore but version 4 does something wrong, too. 3.3.6 then, or 3.4? I suggest that if you want

Re: Switching users in a bash script?

lynx.abraxas wrote: On 27/08/06 12:19:38, Scott wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:11:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here's how you pipe commands. > > > > Throw an "exit" on the end of that, your root password on the front, giving: > > START FILE > > 123456 > > ./configure --prefix

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

So, I compiled with gcc 4.1.1 with patches and sed-commands but: - configure command differs: 5.1.1 --disable-profile --enable-add-ons=linuxthreads .br --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-headers=/usr/include .br --without-cvs 6.2 --disable-profile --enable-add-ons .br --enable

Re: Switching users in a bash script?

On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:10:18 +0300 "Angel Tsankov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Btw, how do I call a function in a bash script from another bash script? > Sorry for the off-topic, but I need this for the package users system. I see 2 ways: 1) If the bash script whose function you want to call co

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

Andrei A. Voropaev a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:46:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> And here I go again... >> >> Just thought about grub. Is all boot-loader part static? Is all of it in >> the >> MBR or does it need something from the host system it was installed from? >> Can I

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:46:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > And here I go again... > > Just thought about grub. Is all boot-loader part static? Is all of it in the > MBR or does it need something from the host system it was installed from? > Can I assume I will still be able to boot i

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

And here I go again... Just thought about grub. Is all boot-loader part static? Is all of it in the MBR or does it need something from the host system it was installed from? Can I assume I will still be able to boot into SuSE with grub after the upgrade, even if something went wrong? Tha

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

On Monday 28 August 2006 2:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a way to figure out completly what was installed by glibc in > the first place to backup it? I didn't use package-users then so > it's not distinguishable from other packages. > > Well thanks again and if You don'

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

Back again. Forgot to ask what gcc version You'd recommend for glibc, and wich for the kernel, and the rest? Should it all be compiled by the same version? I know 2.95 is not good anymore but version 4 does something wrong, too. 3.3.6 then, or 3.4? Lynx -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/ma

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

Hallo! Thanks To all of You who have replied. I find it quite amasing how different people expirenced the upgrade. Some do it just like any other package and everything is fine even if it is not just a micro-version upgrade and other do a big deal about it. I can still remember very well how I

Re: Switching users in a bash script?

On 27/08/06 12:19:38, Scott wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 06:11:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Here's how you pipe commands. > > > > Throw an "exit" on the end of that, your root password on the front, giving: > > START FILE > > 123456 > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > > make > > make i

Re: upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:33:05AM -0500, Dan Nicholson wrote: [...] > So, you want to install into a temporary location. > > make install_root=/some/temp/location install > [...] Hm. I was very ignorant. I've made already 2 upgrades of my glibc (last time to version 2.4) by simply running make