On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
all packages built and installed between 1st adjust and gcc 2nd pass are
ok they reflect the correct /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2, only gcc is wrong.
By removing the source files for gcc did I remove something needed in
the 2nd pass of the gcc b
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It seems that gcc is the only one pointing to lib instead of tools/lib
> > all the others point to tools/lib on the readelf -l command and it looks
> > like the spec file is set
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that gcc is the only one pointing to lib instead of tools/lib
all the others point to tools/lib on the readelf -l command and it looks
like the spec file is set to tools/lib and not lib. Before doing pass 2
of gcc and binutils, I bl
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:54 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure but I think I found it in
> > $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3
> >
> > On viewing it I found this:
> >
> > *dynamic_linker:
> > /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
>
On 8/18/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure but I think I found it in
> $LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3
>
> On viewing it I found this:
>
> *dynamic_linker:
> /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
This is correct. Do
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure but I think I found it in
$LFS/tools/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3
On viewing it I found this:
*dynamic_linker:
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
This is just before a section called *Link_command: towards the end. As
I'm using the
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > >
> > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter
> > >
> > > If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in t
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 17:24 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > >
> > > $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter
> > >
> > > If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in t
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> $ readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter
>
> If the output says /lib/ld-linux.so.2, then you're in trouble because
> that dynamic linker doesn't exist yet inside the chroot. It
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:37 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > configure:2634: gcc --version &5
> > ../glibc-2.3.6/configure: line 2635: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or
> > directory
> > configure:2637: $? = 127
>
> So, does /tools/bin/gcc
Angel Tsankov wrote:
I've really found no other problems with it. Install, uninstall,
monitor. It all works quite well for me, but there was an
aggravating learning curve. Additionally, like the hint promises,
I really know my system and now I understand Makefules.
Did you have to change
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Hi!
I was searching for the sysklogd script.
My first try:
root:/# find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;
find: missing argument to `-exec'
The sintax should be
root:/# find / -name syslogd -exec pwd \;
but anyway this doesn't work because '-exec' argumen
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Why does "find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;" not work?
You need to protect the last ; from the shell so it is passed
as an argument to find, not seen as the end of the find command
by the shell. You can choose \; ";" or ';'
BTW, the description of the -exec actio
On 8/18/06, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
configure:2634: gcc --version &5
../glibc-2.3.6/configure: line 2635: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or
directory
configure:2637: $? = 127
So, does /tools/bin/gcc exist? If so, what happens when you run
`/tools/bin/gcc --version'?
I suspect
When I had originally started I was actually having trouble at
6.12.GCC-4.0.3. After spending a day trying to figure out what went
wrong I decided to start over again. So I blew off everything that I had
built so far including the partitions on my HDD. I have 3 HDDs in my
system.
HDD1 = IDE PATA 1
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Danny wrote:
>> hope I can skip a bit ...
>> -Isysdeps/ieee754 -Isysdeps/generic/elf -Isysdeps/generic
>> -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include include/libc-symbols.h
>> > /sources/glibc-build/c++-types-check.out
>> make[1]: Target 'check
On 8/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Next, I have a look at de_AT and its friends.
root:/# LC_ALLL=de_AT locale charmap
ANSI_X3.4-1968
First, it's LC_ALL with two L's. On my system I get:
$ LC_ALL=de_AT locale charmap
ISO-8859-1
That seems much more sensible as char
Hi again!
This time a more important question. ;-)
Invoking "locale -a" I get the following output:
root:/# locale -a
C
POSIX
de_AT
de_AT.iso88591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
de_DE
de_DE.iso88591
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
en_HK
en_HK.iso88591
en_PH
en_PH.iso88591
en_US
en_US.is
Hi!
I was searching for the sysklogd script.
My first try:
root:/# find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;
find: missing argument to `-exec'
My sucessful try:
root:/# find / -name syslogd
/usr/sbin/syslogd
Question:
--
Why does "find / -name syslogd -exec pwd ;" not work?
Kind regards
I've really found no other problems with it. Install, uninstall, monitor. It all works quite well for me, but there was an
aggravating learning curve. Additionally, like the hint promises, I really know my system and now I understand Makefules.
Did you have to change makefiles too often? An
Angel Tsankov wrote:
I've really found no other problems with it. Install, uninstall,
monitor. It all works quite well for me, but there was an
aggravating learning curve. Additionally, like the hint promises, I
really know my system and now I understand Makefules.
Did you have to change
Richard Szlachta wrote:
Actually, ls -l /mnt/data/tools says it is nor file nor directory. I must
have
misunderstood something in the book.
I think you did. Re-read "4.2. Creating the $LFS/tools Directory" and the
bits
about /tools... in "5.2. Toolchain Technical Notes"
I have placed tool
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 10:39 +0200, Danny wrote:
> Hi
>
> After almost succeeding with my previous built (6.1.1) I thought I start
> over with 6.2. (System PII, 350MHz, 96Mb)
> Everything went well in chapter 5 (although I didn't test as recommended).
> Today I entered:
>
> make -k check 2>&1 | t
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Danny wrote:
> hope I can skip a bit ...
> -Isysdeps/ieee754 -Isysdeps/generic/elf -Isysdeps/generic
> -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include include/libc-symbols.h
> > /sources/glibc-build/c++-types-check.out
> make[1]: Target 'check' not r
Hi
After almost succeeding with my previous built (6.1.1) I thought I start
over with 6.2. (System PII, 350MHz, 96Mb)
Everything went well in chapter 5 (although I didn't test as recommended).
Today I entered:
make -k check 2>&1 | tee glibc-check-log
and after some time the system halted here
25 matches
Mail list logo
