thanks .
i did have problem with expect-5.44.1, which require tkConfig.sh to be present,
and after install tk it seemed ok, expect was not used much up to now,
so there's little chance for me to find it,
nor did i noticed the claim on expect site.
i do want to try with newer version, most of them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, short answer is yes.
i created a new partition, make symbolic link to /tool,
clean all enviroment variables except HOME, TERM and so on,
binutils-2.17
gcc-4.1.1 pass 1
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0
Glibc-2.4
Tcl-8.4.13
Tk-8.4.13
Expect-5.44.1
DejaGNU-1.4.4
well, short answer is yes.
i created a new partition, make symbolic link to /tool,
clean all enviroment variables except HOME, TERM and so on,
binutils-2.17
gcc-4.1.1 pass 1
Linux-Libc-Headers-2.6.12.0
Glibc-2.4
Tcl-8.4.13
Tk-8.4.13
Expect-5.44.1
DejaGNU-1.4.4
these all went fine, and f
Has anyone used the program called truecrypt? http://www.truecrypt.org
I am writing a wrapper script for mount (/sbin/mount.tcfs) that checks
the user's homedir for a password file and will eventually pass it to
truecrypt so that the standard mount command can be used without user
interaction. Mo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i'm using gcc-4.1.1 to build the tool chain,
while it blocked at pass 2,
and gcc reported no limits.h was found.
my patch to gcc source:
in gcc/configure:
change STMP_FIXINC=stmp-fixinc
to STMP_FIXINC=
in gcc/cppdefaults.h:
added
#undef STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR
#d
hi,
i'm using gcc-4.1.1 to build the tool chain,
while it blocked at pass 2,
and gcc reported no limits.h was found.
my patch to gcc source:
in gcc/configure:
change STMP_FIXINC=stmp-fixinc
to STMP_FIXINC=
in gcc/cppdefaults.h:
added
#undef STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR
#define STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR
> any linux is a build os.
I think any linux with _the kernel 2.6.x_ if you use one of the latest
books (development or stable-6.1.1)
> I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum of hassle and
> effort, I don't mind swapping host OS's.
Try LFS LiveCD.
--
Nothing but perfection
pv
--
h
On 6/29/06, Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is... build distro for LFS?
There isn't. Supposedly the build should bootstrap from any distro
supplying the development tools mentioned in Host Requirements. This
is not always the case, though, and
--- Ross Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is...
> build distro for LFS?
>
> I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum
> of hassle and effort,
> I don't mind swapping host OS's.
>
> Regards
> Ross
> --
any linux is a build os. for simplest
Hi there,.. whats the "official" if there is... build distro for LFS?
I'd like to start playing with it with the minimum of hassle and effort,
I don't mind swapping host OS's.
Regards
Ross
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 6/28/06, lanas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now I have no idea what grub
expects the hda drive to be. I've tried simply counting from the first
sda drive (i.e. hd3 for hda) but this does not work.
Do you have the file ${LFS}/boot/grub/device.map? That should describe
th
11 matches
Mail list logo