Re: Is these errors ok?

2006-05-20 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 08:48:17AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 5/20/06, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Im building on a 32bit ubuntu running on my 64bit Athlon64. > >Is that considered as a 64bit system or a 32bit? > Provided the kernel is 32-bit (uname -m reports i686, NOT

Re: Is these errors ok?

2006-05-20 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/20/06, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Im building on a 32bit ubuntu running on my 64bit Athlon64. Is that considered as a 64bit system or a 32bit? In that case, you could build the straight 32 bit LFS book, but might still have problems. I've never tried this, so I can't rea

Re: Is these errors ok?

2006-05-20 Thread Søren Christensen
Im building on a 32bit ubuntu running on my 64bit Athlon64. Is that considered as a 64bit system or a 32bit? From: "Dan Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: LFS Support List To: "LFS Support List" Subject: Re: Is these errors ok? Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:23:33 -0700 On 5/20/06, Søren C

Re: Is these errors ok?

2006-05-20 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/20/06, Søren Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Im on section 6.11 I wanna know if i have any critical errors before i continue. Im building on a Ubuntu 5.10 System Amd Athlon 64 3000+ 1024mb If you're building on a 64 bit processor, the LFS book probably won't work for you. Lo

Re: LFS Version SVN-20060501 - GCC-4.0.3 - compilation fails

2006-05-20 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 5/20/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 58.) GCC-4.0.3 cd /sources cd ./gcc-4.0.3 > If you're scripting, you have to be very careful. You need to know > that the script will continue unless you have some sort of error > handling scheme. If you don't a crucial

Re: LFS Version SVN-20060501 - GCC-4.0.3 - compilation fails

2006-05-20 Thread Mag. Leonhard Landrock
Hi! Sorry for the delay of my response. :-( Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 23:37 schrieb Dan Nicholson: > On 5/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry to ask, but what are the important symlinks? > > These guys: OK. Obviously not a smart question (http://catb.org/~esr/fa

Is these errors ok?

2006-05-20 Thread Søren Christensen
Hello Im on section 6.11 I wanna know if i have any critical errors before i continue. Im building on a Ubuntu 5.10 System Amd Athlon 64 3000+ 1024mb root:/sources/glibc-build# make -k check >glibc-check-log 2>&1 root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-