Re: nvidia-installer

2006-02-23 Thread bjd
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:15:15AM +0100, Tim van der Molen wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:22:55 +0100, bjd wrote: > > I've been setting up LFS over the past couple of days, and was up > > to installing nvidia's proprietary driver for x86_64, > > Why did you install the x86_64 version if you have

Re: nvidia-installer

2006-02-23 Thread Tim van der Molen
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:22:55 +0100, bjd wrote: > I've been setting up LFS over the past couple of days, and was up > to installing nvidia's proprietary driver for x86_64, Why did you install the x86_64 version if you have built LFS? Or did you mean CLFS? Tim -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailma

nvidia-installer

2006-02-23 Thread bjd
I've been setting up LFS over the past couple of days, and was up to installing nvidia's proprietary driver for x86_64, NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-1.0-8178-pkg2.run, but several attempts failed. Investigation revealed that I had to create a symlink /lib64 -> /lib to make that work. Bauke Jan Douma -- h

Re: gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Terror Duizel wrote: /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so:5: syntax error Oh, I misread so:5 as so.5 - sorry for the noise. As to using fedora, I can remember somebody saying fedora couldn't compile LFS because fedora was using newer versions. I can remem

Re: gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/23/06, Terror Duizel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/23/06, Terror Duizel wrote: > > > >mv libgcc_s.so.1.tmp libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so > >/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file format not > >recognized; treating as linker script > >/tools/i686-pc-linux

gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Terror Duizel
On 2/23/06, Terror Duizel wrote: i did everything as the book says but i get the next error when bootstrap gcc-3.4.3: mv libgcc_s.so.1.tmp libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file format not recognized; treating as linker script /to

Re: grub setup Error 22

2006-02-23 Thread Alan Lord
> as grub won't be able to install to a boot sector of a "virtual" disk it needs a physical device. Grub won't have loaded any drivers to make the raid array visable at boot time you need a single disk really. Matt I installed grub on an old IBM Rackmount server with dual processors and

Re: grub setup Error 22

2006-02-23 Thread Matt Darcy
Subhash Chandra wrote: AFAIK, grub is okay with H/W raid. I use raid 0 h/W raid. how ever you need inbuilt raid drivers in kernel to actually use linux. On 2/23/06, Titus Dingjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Darcy wrote: /boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions. It's a hardware rai

Re: gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Terror Duizel wrote: i did everything as the book says but i get the next error when bootstrap gcc-3.4.3: mv libgcc_s.so.1.tmp libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file format not recognized; treating as linker

Re: gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 2/23/06, Terror Duizel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i did everything as the book says but i get the next error when bootstrap > gcc-3.4.3: > > mv libgcc_s.so.1.tmp libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so > /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file format not > recognized; t

gcc-3.4.3 bootstrap error

2006-02-23 Thread Terror Duizel
i did everything as the book says but i get the next error when bootstrap gcc-3.4.3: mv libgcc_s.so.1.tmp libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file format not recognized; treating as linker script /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/us

Re: grub setup Error 22

2006-02-23 Thread Subhash Chandra
AFAIK, grub is okay with H/W raid. I use raid 0 h/W raid. how ever you need inbuilt raid drivers in kernel to actually use linux. On 2/23/06, Titus Dingjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Darcy wrote: > >/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions. > > > It's a hardware raid5 on a compaq sma

RE: grub setup Error 22

2006-02-23 Thread Titus Dingjan
Matt Darcy wrote: >/boot cannot reside on raid 0 5 or 6 paritions. It's a hardware raid5 on a compaq smart array 641 does that make it any different? <>-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above infor

Re: grub setup Error 22

2006-02-23 Thread Matt Darcy
Dan Nicholson wrote: On 2/22/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not a raid man, but I noticed a while back that RedHat extensively patches grub, and a few of their patches specifically have to do with grub. Uh, specifically have to do with raid. /boot cannot reside on raid 0 5