Hi Justin,
> I am using the LiveCD,
- snip -
> I would like to see how to
> keep track of what files different packages
> install.
I'm running LiveCD to build LFS and run "script" to record keystrokes
and screen output and save the same on HD. Because once reboot the
logfile will disappear.
> Look at the FAQ listed in the signature of this email.
> --
> Dan
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
Oh crap! That's usually the first thing I do! Can't belive I
over
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 09:33, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Matt Darcy wrote these words on 01/31/06 09:28 CST:
> > http://redora.redhat.com
>
> It looks like that dog in the old Jetsons cartoon typed this.
> What was its name, Astro? :-)
>
Oh boy, more LFS humor.
Is this one of those distros tha
On 2/1/06, Justin O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well anyway, before I start into chapter 6, I would like to see how to
> keep track of what files different packages install. Not exactly a
> Package Manager, just a system of keeping track of what I got. Any
> suggestions? I've looked into P
Hello,
I have successfully completed chapter 5 in the LFS 6.1 book. I am using
the LiveCD, and I have to say, that thing is a piece of work!
Well anyway, before I start into chapter 6, I would like to see how to
keep track of what files different packages install. Not exactly a
Package Manager,
--- Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...(if you follow me)...
yep, i follow. thank you for the alternative, i'll probably try it out
sometime, just to satisfy my curiosity. i've set it up how i want it
for right now, though. grub is on hdb's MBR and BIOS drive priority is
to check hdb fi
On 2/1/06, rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> >Did configure give you an error, or did you just go looking through
> >config.log and found this? Because there'll be tons of errors in
> >config.log. If you got an error from running configure, what did tha
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>Did configure give you an error, or did you just go looking through
>config.log and found this? Because there'll be tons of errors in
>config.log. If you got an error from running configure, what did that
>say? If not, you can move on.
The error was onl
On 2/1/06, rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Started over today using 6.1.1 with the LiveCd as host. Upon
> running config of binutls pass 1 section 5.3 I get the
> following error message
>
> configure:2252:17: gmp.h: No such file or directory
Did configure give you an error, or did you just go
Started over today using 6.1.1 with the LiveCd as host. Upon
running config of binutls pass 1 section 5.3 I get the
following error message
configure:2252:17: gmp.h: No such file or directory
configure: In function `main':
configure:2256: error: `choke' undeclared (first use in this
function)
co
On 2/1/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've seen non-zero returns from pwconv and grpconv on a fairly recent
> Shadow.
Interesting. This doesn't happen for me. I found another one in my
scripts that maybe fails:
cd /usr/share/info
rm dir
for f in *
do install-info $f dir 2>/dev/
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
As far as I know, the only commands in
the LFS book that will complete unsuccessfully are make check's and
the stripping commands.
I've seen non-zero returns from pwconv and grpconv on a fairly recent
Shadow.
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das
On 2/1/06, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
> *dejagnu*, and issued the command
> *expect -c "spawn ls"* the shell just echoes *spawn ls*. Why is this?
As the others have said, that's the right output. You can get into
Richard Melville wrote:
/ Hi
/>/
/>/ This is my third attempt at building LFS 6.1 as I have not had enough
/>/ time to complete before.
/>/ Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
/>/ *dejagnu*, and issued the command
/>/ *expect -c "spawn ls"* the shell just echoes
On 2/1/06, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/06, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > During installation of perl, I add the option
> > -Dotherlibdirs=/usr/lib/perl-addons to Configure. This allows me to
> > keep the perl package and perl modules separate.
>
> Isn't it the
Richard Melville wrote:
Hi
This is my third attempt at building LFS 6.1 as I have not had enough
time to complete before.
Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
*dejagnu*, and issued the command
*expect -c "spawn ls"* the shell just echoes *spawn ls*. Why is this?
Richard Melville wrote:
Hi
This is my third attempt at building LFS 6.1 as I have not had enough
time to complete before.
Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
*dejagnu*, and issued the command
*expect -c "spawn ls"* the shell just echoes *spawn ls*. Why is this?
On 2/1/06, Tushar Teredesai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During installation of perl, I add the option
> -Dotherlibdirs=/usr/lib/perl-addons to Configure. This allows me to
> keep the perl package and perl modules separate.
Isn't it the meaning of site_perl ?
> If you are installing to / then yo
Hi
This is my third attempt at building LFS 6.1 as I have not had enough
time to complete before.
Each time I have reached the PTY test after the installation of
*dejagnu*, and issued the command
*expect -c "spawn ls"* the shell just echoes *spawn ls*. Why is this?
Thanks in advance
Richard
On 2/1/06, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've used, since the beginning and up to now, the package users system.
> I've got a user (perl) that is the owner of the Perl package.
During installation of perl, I add the option
-Dotherlibdirs=/usr/lib/perl-addons to Configure. This allows
Thanks
I think I will assign any new package user installing things in
Perl in a new group, let it be "perlish".
Then I will make writeable by that group all the files in the
/usr/lib/perl5/ structure. (after each installation, of course)
Another question:
- do you know if there is a mechanism
Dr. Edgar Alwers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 11:49, Stefan Krah wrote:
> > For a single host on the network:
> >
> > ping -n1 && arp -a
>
> delivers invalid option --1
> also other options ( -Rv ) do not deliver my MAC's :-(
It's actually:
ping -c1 && arp -a
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/01/06 09:19 CST:
> I don't understand how it decides
> between lib/perl5/site_perl and lib/perl5/5.8.7. Looks like you'll
> have to give write privelages on both.
Almost *always* lib/perl5/5.8.7 is what is installed from the Perl
distribution itself. site_p
On 2/1/06, Luca Dionisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is:
>- what are the commands commonly used in the install phase?
Don't know. Look at a Makefile from a module.
>- where are the new files going?
Here's a list from two common modules
Module-Info-0.28
#!paco-1.9.6 11287996
Luca Dionisi wrote these words on 02/01/06 08:57 CST:
> I've used, since the beginning and up to now, the package users system.
> I've got a user (perl) that is the owner of the Perl package.
>
> As I understand, to install a module, or even a program written in Perl,
> the common practise is to
Hi community,
I eventually need to install some Perl programs (and modules).
I've used, since the beginning and up to now, the package users system.
I've got a user (perl) that is the owner of the Perl package.
As I understand, to install a module, or even a program written in Perl,
the common p
On 1/31/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the package you're trying to install is Gtk-Perl-0.7009 then
> good luck. This package is a mother-f**. Hint: keep running the
> build until it builds everything. Chances are it won't the first time
> through. It really sucks. With pati
boovarahan boovarahan wrote:
Hi All !
Now that I have got my own LFS stsyem, I want to move around to BLFS.
Unfortunately, the softwares have to be downloaded manually from various
sites which is laborious and time consuming. I wish I had them like LFS live CD.
One more point ! Having used KDE
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 11:39, you wrote:
>On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:50, Rainer Peter Feller wrote:
>> hm ...
>> ifconfig -a
>> ifconfig from net-tools
>
>Tja, one problem is that ifconfig does not more exist for kernel
> 2.6.15, and iwconfig -a does not the job ! ;-(
>Edgar
tcpdump -i
>The next task at hand is to figure out how to
> > tweak the windows boot.ini file to default boot my LFS system. After
> > that I can modify any and all linux configuration files to suit my
> > tastes. Once I've accomplished that, it's on to the BLFS book. :-D
I am playing with a lot of lin
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 11:49, Stefan Krah wrote:
> For a single host on the network:
>
> ping -n1 && arp -a
delivers invalid option --1
also other options ( -Rv ) do not deliver my MAC's :-(
Edgar
--
-
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers
Weinheim
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/m
Hi All !
Now that I have got my own LFS stsyem, I want to move around to BLFS.
Unfortunately, the softwares have to be downloaded manually from various
sites which is laborious and time consuming. I wish I had them like LFS live CD.
One more point ! Having used KDE and GNOME, now I want to have
"Michell L. Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Necessary of aid to compile kernel.. I compiled and this giving to this
> message of error when start mine linux?
>
> My partitions are of the type reiserfs, in make menuconfig in file system
> activated the support for reiserfs.
>
> Error in st
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 04:12, Jim Gifford wrote:
> Thanx John, we really appreciate the comments. The CLFS list is up as
> cross-lfs, still awaiting gmane to sync up with it.
>
Saw that, but figured it was for book-development comments. Signed up and see
you there!
Cheers,
John Ga
Josh wrote:
> One thing I noticed in doing this, was that my hard drives were swapped
in grub, but not once the LFS Operating System took over. What I mean
by that is that where LFS's hda was grub's (hd0) and hdb was grub's
(hd1), after I changed the boot priority in my BIOS, hda (the windows
d
35 matches
Mail list logo
