Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread Karl
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 03:31 +, Karl wrote: > > It's ok, I am studying the "/etc/rc.d/init.d/localnet" Solved: - in "/etc/initng/net/lo" - service net/lo { # */ need = system/mountfs system/modules system/hostname; use = system/static-modules system/coldplug; e

Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread Karl
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 03:27 +, Karl wrote: > It's ok, I am studying the "/etc/rc.d/init.d/loopback" Should be "/etc/rc.d/init.d/localnet" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread Karl
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 02:44 +, Karl wrote: > could you steer me in > the right direction how to set up /etc/initng/net/eth0 and ---"---/lo > please, mucho appreciato! It's ok, I am studying the "/etc/rc.d/init.d/loopback" and "network" files for hints. Still, any tips appreciated :) -- http:

Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread Karl
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 14:17 +0100, Philipp Christian Ammann wrote: > 2.) use initng (http://initng.thinktux.net/index.php/Main_Page) instead of > sysvinit. > regards, > philipp Hi, I got it working sweet except for eth0 and lo. I have no ifup or ifdown commands and can't seem to find a howto, co

Re: CPU-type wierdness

2005-12-09 Thread Peter B. Steiger
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 13:32 -0700, Archaic wrote: > Never underestimate the level of weirdness that can happen when a stick > of RAM goes bad. ;) Amen! My daughter was using two 256MB sticks on her Winduhs machine for months and I thought the occasional lockups were just Windows being Windows, but

Re: CPU-type wierdness

2005-12-09 Thread Archaic
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:52:57AM -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > > If you can reproduce this (when you have the time) I'd be interested in > seeing more about what's going on. Never underestimate the level of weirdness that can happen when a stick of RAM goes bad. ;) The person who has physical

Re: login question

2005-12-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 12/9/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ryan Moszynski wrote: > > now, the directions for exim require you to logout of root and log > > back in as a regular user that the directions tell you to create. my > > question is, how do you do that from the livecd environment? > > When y

Re: login question

2005-12-09 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Ryan Moszynski wrote: > i recently finished my main installation. i used the lfs live cd as > host and everything went smoothly. In fact so smoothly that i'm not > quite ready to give up that environment just yet. I am attempting to > install lynx so i can read the blfs book while actually runni

login question

2005-12-09 Thread Ryan Moszynski
i recently finished my main installation. i used the lfs live cd as host and everything went smoothly. In fact so smoothly that i'm not quite ready to give up that environment just yet. I am attempting to install lynx so i can read the blfs book while actually running the system i just built, an

Re: Patching expect-5.43

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Melville
Richard Melville wrote: / Thanks Dave. Do you mean that if the Hunks aren't listed then they />/ have succeeded? In addition, an offset of 103 lines isn't *off by a />/ line or so.* Is this still acceptable?/ Yep. :) If the hunks aren't listed, they've succeeded. :) And the offset of 1

RE: Patching expect-5.43

2005-12-09 Thread David Fix
> Thanks Dave. Do you mean that if the Hunks aren't listed then they > have succeeded? In addition, an offset of 103 lines isn't *off by a > line or so.* Is this still acceptable? Yep. :) If the hunks aren't listed, they've succeeded. :) And the offset of 103 lines is fine... It just means

Re: Patching expect-5.43

2005-12-09 Thread Randy McMurchy
Richard Melville wrote these words on 12/09/05 09:30 CST: > Thanks Dave. Do you mean that if the Hunks aren't listed then they > have succeeded? In addition, an offset of 103 lines isn't *off by a > line or so.* > Is this still acceptable? Yes. Even though it's ugly and there is fuzz along wit

Re: Patching expect-5.43

2005-12-09 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 12/9/05, Richard Melville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > />/ and I've just applied the expect-5.43.0-spawn-1.patch. I received > > />/ the following output:- />/ />/ patching file exp_chan.c > > />/ Hunk #1 succeeded at 622 (offset 103 lines) [...] > Thanks Dave. Do you mean that if the Hunk

Re: Patching expect-5.43

2005-12-09 Thread Richard Melville
Richard Melville wrote: /Hi />/ />/ I'd welcome some advice. I'm up to chapter 5.9.1 in the 6.1 LFS book />/ and I've just applied the expect-5.43.0-spawn-1.patch. I received />/ the following output:- />/ />/ patching file exp_chan.c />/ Hunk #1 succeeded at 622 (offset 103 lines) />/ pat

Re: CPU-type wierdness

2005-12-09 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Archaic wrote: > FWIW, the livecd kernel, or the burned disk, is in some way flawed on > this particular machine as I can reproduce an internal compiler error > everytime. The same iso works fine building LFS on other machines with > older procs. It's not the livecd toolchain, either, because I ca

Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread Hari
On 12/8/05, Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As regards tips: I would say the best way of getting fast boot times is > to compile all the needed stuff into the kernel ("y" not "m") and remove Maybe not. I would recommend that network drivers and alsa drivers be compiled as modules than into the k

Re: job done.

2005-12-09 Thread pca
> I second the InitNG recommendation. I got my 3 minute debain boot down to 1 minute just by doing the two things above. initng should decrease booting time (depending on what is beeing loaded) up to 1/3 of sysvinit's without any further optimization. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/

Re: defkeymap.c not found

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Benton
Chandan M. C. wrote: Hai , During compilation of keymap into the kernel-2.6.11.12 in chapter 8.3 of lfs6.1.1 .i couldn't find the defkeymap.c instead it has defkeymap.c_shipped and defkeymap.map. This is the command i have to run. loadkeys -m /usr/share/kbd/keymaps/[path to keym

Re: defkeymap.c not found

2005-12-09 Thread Alan Lord
Chandan M. C. wrote: Hai , During compilation of keymap into the kernel-2.6.11.12 in chapter 8.3 of lfs6.1.1 .i couldn't find the defkeymap.c instead it has defkeymap.c_shipped and defkeymap.map. This is the command i have to run. loadkeys -m /usr/share/kbd/keymaps/[path to keym

defkeymap.c not found

2005-12-09 Thread Chandan M. C.
Hai , During compilation of keymap into the kernel-2.6.11.12 in chapter 8.3 of lfs6.1.1 .i couldn't find the defkeymap.c instead it has defkeymap.c_shipped and defkeymap.map. This is the command i have to run. loadkeys -m /usr/share/kbd/keymaps/[path to keymap] > \ drivers/ch

Re: suspicious

2005-12-09 Thread Randy McMurchy
Ryan Moszynski wrote these words on 12/09/05 02:50 CST: > what in the world can be suspicious about "login question?" > i'm pretty creative and i can't figure it out. You probably sent the email in HTML and not plain text. HTML messages are bounced with that exact message. -- Randy rmlscsi: [G

Re: suggestion

2005-12-09 Thread Randy McMurchy
Ryan Moszynski wrote these words on 12/09/05 02:41 CST: > am i missing something? Yes, I urge you to check out the last command in section 6.58.1 in the 6.1.1 stable book. :-) In the future, please report (ask) these types of questions to the LFS-Support list. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld versio

suspicious

2005-12-09 Thread Ryan Moszynski
i just sent a question to this list with the subject: login question. i though that it was a funny subject since, normally if someone was having a problem "logging in" to their computer, i would suggest their hardware be donated to goodwill so that someone more deserving could use it. so what, rig