On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is this the correct list for crosslfs questions?
no.
the cross lfs list
itself looks like it's meant just for questions about the book rather
than general questions.
rday
AFAIK, it was intended to keep us off the main lfs lists, perhaps to
On 11/9/05, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yOn Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > On 11/9/05, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > is this the correct list for crosslfs questions? the cross lfs
> > > list itself looks like it's meant just for questions
yOn Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > is this the correct list for crosslfs questions? the cross lfs
> > list itself looks like it's meant just for questions about the
> > book rather than general questions.
>
> No, general q
On 11/9/05, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is this the correct list for crosslfs questions? the cross lfs list
> itself looks like it's meant just for questions about the book rather
> than general questions.
No, general questions, too. There just pushing on getting the book
r
On 11/9/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > Whether the layout structure needs more massaging is up to you, but I
> > wouldn't remove the apr stuff unless you want to be the guinea pig.
> >
>
> Well I delete /usr/build and I've not seen any problems, but that's n
is this the correct list for crosslfs questions? the cross lfs list
itself looks like it's meant just for questions about the book rather
than general questions.
rday
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
Hi, the news server is out of service, so I have to post this way.
---
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:05:17PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Steffen R. Knollmann wrote these words on 11/08/05 17:57 CST:
>
> > Actual
rick wrote:
I hadn't performed the make install, but would it be
advisable to go ahead and remove the /usr/bin/gcc anyhow or
is this wasted effort?
If you didn't do a make install there shouldn't be a /usr/bin/gcc :)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: htt
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> At section 6.14 I missed performing the sed substitution.
>> What are my options from this point?
>> Go back to the sed substitution and start from there or do I
>> have to begin section 6 again?
>Yes, that should be fine. Make sure you remove the
rick wrote:
At section 6.14 I missed performing the sed substitution. I
did not catch my mistake until I had performed the configure
and make.
What are my options from this point?
Go back to the sed substitution and start from there or do I
have to begin section 6 again?
Yes, that should
At section 6.14 I missed performing the sed substitution. I
did not catch my mistake until I had performed the configure
and make.
What are my options from this point?
Go back to the sed substitution and start from there or do I
have to begin section 6 again? I did perform a backup at
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
