Hi there, this is my first post on the list.
I'm stating my studies to build my LFS... My first question is:
Is there many diferences to build my LFS with ext2 and with ReiserFS ?
My host Linux suports ReiserFS and I have alerady formated my LFS
partition with ReiserFS...
I think that the un
On 7/10/05, Razvan Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have built a LFS system, and I would like to find
> out how I could build it using uclibc instead of
> glibc.
>
> I'm not interested on putting it on a floppy or
> something, I just want to build a system which should
> be as large as 30-
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:35:41PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On my 6.1-testing system, _nothing_ shows except rsync's modified
> version of zlib.
OT, *why* does rsync do this? I've Googled lots of discussions about
making gzip rsync-friendly but it's not clear if this has been
implemented, or
I have built a LFS system, and I would like to find
out how I could build it using uclibc instead of
glibc.
I'm not interested on putting it on a floppy or
something, I just want to build a system which should
be as large as 30-40 MB.
As I've seen, binaries compiled against uclibc are
very small.
On 7/8/05, Declan Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Move or rename the /lib/modules/ subdir before you do
> make modules_install. You can build, fix grub, and so forth before the
> modules_install.
>
> Also be aware that the 'depmod -ae -F' that the kernel runs checks
> _all_ the module tree
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1. This release includes a large number of package upgrades
(including Linux-2.6.11.12, GCC-3.4.3 and Glibc-2.3.4) and security
fixes (including the recently disclosed zlib vulnerability). It also
includes a large am
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Dan Osterrath wrote:
>
> Have a look at http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/find-zlib
> This perl script searches for programs statically linked against zlib.
>
Thanks for the reminder, Dan.
On my 6.1-testing system, _nothing_ shows except rsync's modified
version of zlib
José Carlos Carrión Plaza schrieb:
> The question is:
>
> The zlib library is compiled in static and shared forms. Once it will be
> updated, the shared versions will be accessible inmediately. But, the
> programs compiled against the static version of this library remained
> with the old (and vul
On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, [ISO-8859-1] José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
> Dear list members:
>
> Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
> 200507-05 / zlib»?
>
Hopefully, that's the same one that archaic posted a patch for on
lfs-security earlier this week (i.e. fixed in 6.1-
Stephen Liu wrote:
Today I turned on the box resuming building LFS and
re-mounted all mount points starting from "Section
6.2. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems"
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/kernfs.htm
onward and came to this situation.
I see. After doing the 'fa
Hi folks,
FC3
===
After booting the PC how to login root shell with bash
prompt as
root:/#
I already re-ran following commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# export LFS=/mnt/lfs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir -p $LFS/{proc,sys}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t proc proc $LFS/proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount
I'm building a lfs-6.0 linux-system. I reached the 6.8 chapter, but I
just can't get the /dev directory populated.
I read other messages about similar problems, but the solution was to
mount the sysfs.
I've tried to do it a lot of times, but I didn't have it populated.
Going to the binutils chap
Hi Andrew,
> Stephen Liu wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -n -t ramfs none /dev
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t devpts -o
> gid=4,mode=620
> > none /dev/pts
> > mount: mount point /dev/pts does not exist
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t tmpfs none /dev/shm
> > mount: mount point /dev/sh
Stephen Liu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -n -t ramfs none /dev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t devpts -o gid=4,mode=620
none /dev/pts
mount: mount point /dev/pts does not exist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t tmpfs none /dev/shm
mount: mount point /dev/shm does not exist
Why did you run the
Hi folks,
Section 6.11. Glibc-2.3.4-20040701
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/glibc.html
first part went through without complaint
# make
# make check
..
...
make[2]: ***
[/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/stdio-common/scanf4.out]
Error 134
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/m
Hi folks,
Continued building LFS
"6.11.1. Installation of Glibc" which looks more or
less the same as "5.8. Glibc-2.3.4-20040701"
The first part went through without complaint.
>>>
Remark: Since the FC3 box was freshly turned on,
re-run following commands;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
Password:
José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
Dear list members:
Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
200507-05 / zlib»?
Yep, we've fixed this in LFS-6.1-pre2 and also the devlopment (trunk)
version of the book.
But which are the programs of LFS and BLFS that are been
co
Dear list members:
Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
200507-05 / zlib»?
(More information can be founded at
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200507-05.xml )
The problem is a buffer overflow in zlib that permits the execution of
arbitrary code in
18 matches
Mail list logo
