On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 13:59 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book
LFS 6.0 yes?
Yes
I retrieved my packages by doing
wget
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wget/lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 13:59 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using rev 6.0 of the book
LFS 6.0 yes?
> I retrieved my packages by doing
>
> wget
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wget/lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
> wget -i lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
LFS pack
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using rev 6.0 of the book
> I retrieved my packages by doing
>
> wget
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wget/lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
> wget -i lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
>
Blimey, this could become a FAQ at th
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book
I retrieved my packages by doing
wget
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wget/lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
wget -i lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
I'm in chapter 5, section
5.35. Udev-030
but my udev
Hello,
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book
I retrieved my packages by doing
wget
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wget/lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
wget -i lfs-6.1-testing-20050129.wget
I'm in chapter 5, section
5.35. Udev-030
but my udev is version 050. Perhaps no big
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 10:37:19AM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> >I'm building (or at least trying) LFS 6.0. Everything went good I think,
> >but when doing 5.34: Perl-5.8.5 I encounter a strange error:
> >
> >make first states it's skipping lib/auto/Fnctl
Jim Gifford wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> Jim Gifford wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't agree with Jim on this one. I build bootable systems with
>> several LFS packages missing. For instance, you don't need Sysvinit or
>> Syslog just to boot. If you don't believe me try this from your grub
>> prom
TheOldFellow wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
I don't agree with Jim on this one. I build bootable systems with
several LFS packages missing. For instance, you don't need Sysvinit or
Syslog just to boot. If you don't believe me try this from your grub
prompt:
Richard that's why I said a basi
Ken Moffat wrote:
It might pay you to read the references in the 'Prerequisites' part of
the book, and perhaps the Bash Programming - Introduction HOWTO and the
Advanced Bash Scripting Guide. I'm deliberately not giving you links to
these two - we all make errors and mistakes in ours builds, of
Jim Gifford wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm a first time LFS user, and I'm working my way through the 6.0
revision of the book. I have purchased the paper book which I am reading
for background, and I am using the online book for building my system
(easier to copy and paste from onl
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, steve crosby wrote:
On 7/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book. I'm in chapter 5.
Section 5.29. Bash-3.0 doesn't say to apply the patch, but when I
downloaded the required patches it came with two:
bash-3.0-avoid_WCONTINU
Kuba wrote:
Hi All
During gettext-0.14.1 (LFS6) compilation I get the error :
^^
This compilation unit indirectly references the missing type java.lang.Object
(typically some required class file is referencing a type outsi
Hi All
During gettext-0.14.1 (LFS6) compilation I get the error :
^^
This compilation unit indirectly references the missing type java.lang.Object
(typically some required class file is referencing a type outside the
classpa
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Stephen Liu wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su - lfs
> Password:
>
> lfs:~$ echo $LFS
> /mnt/lfs
>
Correct.
> lfs:~$ cat > ~/.bash_profile << "EOF"
> > exec env -i HOME=$HOME TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ '
> /bin/bash
> > EOF
> lfs:~$ cat > ~/.bashrc << "EOF"
> > set +h
> > umask
Matthew Burgess wrote:
...
Yes, updating to lfs-bootscripts-3.2.2, udev-058 and the newer udev
rules file should be safe enough to do. udev-059 was recently released,
though it included major changes which we haven't been able to assess
the affects of yet, so I'd strongly suggest you stick wi
Hi Ken,
Tks for your advice.
Repeated 4.4. Setting Up the Environment
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter04/settingenvironment.html
Started a new Konsole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su - lfs
Password:
lfs:~$ echo $LFS
/mnt/lfs
lfs:~$ cat > ~/.bash_profile << "EOF"
> exec env -
Jim Gifford wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a first time LFS user, and I'm working my way through the 6.0
>> revision of the book. I have purchased the paper book which I am reading
>> for background, and I am using the online book for building my system
>> (easier to copy
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Stephen Liu wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir -p $LFS/{proc,sys}
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t proc proc $LFS/proc
> mount: proc already mounted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t sysfs sysfs $LFS/sys
> mount: sysfs already mounted o
Hi folks,
I'm now held on
6.2. Mounting Virtual Kernel File Systems
http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter06/kernfs.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ su -
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mkdir -p $LFS/{proc,sys}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# mount -t proc proc $LFS/proc
mount: proc already mo
steve crosby wrote:
just building now with udev-059. One change is that udevstart now
launches udev as a process (with a --daemon flag), so you can't umount
/dev without stopping that process (/dev is reported as busy), so we
might need to modify the "Booting into LFS" section.
Other than some
On 7/2/05, Matthew Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rules file should be safe enough to do. udev-059 was recently released,
> though it included major changes which we haven't been able to assess
> the affects of yet, so I'd strongly suggest you stick with udev-058 for now.
>
just buildin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm building (or at least trying) LFS 6.0. Everything went good I think,
but when doing 5.34: Perl-5.8.5 I encounter a strange error:
make first states it's skipping lib/auto/Fnctl/Fnctl.a because the
directory does not exist. Then it says:
Try 'IO Fcntl POSIX'
Dan McGhee wrote:
My question is this:
After backing up the scripts I have changed in both /etc/sysconfig and
/etc/rc.d/init.d, can I just run the "install" commands for the udev
packages and the bootscripts?
Yes, updating to lfs-bootscripts-3.2.2, udev-058 and the newer udev
rules file sh
Hi all
I'm building (or at least trying) LFS 6.0. Everything went good I think,
but when doing 5.34: Perl-5.8.5 I encounter a strange error:
make first states it's skipping lib/auto/Fnctl/Fnctl.a because the
directory does not exist. Then it says:
Note (probably harmless): No library found for -
On 7/2/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using rev 6.0 of the book. I'm in chapter 5.
>
> Section 5.29. Bash-3.0 doesn't say to apply the patch, but when I
> downloaded the required patches it came with two:
>
>bash-3.0-avoid_WCONTINUED-1.patch
>bash-3.0-fixes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm a first time LFS user, and I'm working my way through the 6.0
revision of the book. I have purchased the paper book which I am reading
for background, and I am using the online book for building my system
(easier to copy and paste from online than paper :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book. I'm in chapter 5.
Section 5.29. Bash-3.0 doesn't say to apply the patch, but when I
downloaded the required patches it came with two:
bash-3.0-avoid_WCONTINUED-1.patch
bash-3.0-fixes-1.patch
Should they be applied or not?
Thanks
I'm using rev 6.0 of the book. I'm in chapter 5.
Section 5.29. Bash-3.0 doesn't say to apply the patch, but when I
downloaded the required patches it came with two:
bash-3.0-avoid_WCONTINUED-1.patch
bash-3.0-fixes-1.patch
Should they be applied or not?
Thanks,
Michael
--
http:/
28 matches
Mail list logo
