Trying to move from Red Hat 8.0 (kernel 1.4) to 1.6

Please excuse what may seem to be an "RTFM" question. I promise, promise that I -have- looked. I'm trying to move from Red Hat 8.0 to LFS 1.6. Obviously this means that I am trying to compile the toolchain (specifically at this point glibc) under the 1.4 kernel. I am now confronting the "the

Re: Using LVM partitions

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.) wrote: > I'm trying to boot up to my new LFS 6.0 partition which is a LVM > logical volume, but I am getting this: > > ...(snipped) > device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl (2003-12-10 initialised: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ...(snipped) > VFS: Cannot open root device

HotPlug and Udev Questions

Although most of my questions concern post_LFS issues, I'm posting here because the discussion of modules and devices is in LFS-6.0. If my questions are not appropriate for this list, I'll transfer them to BLFS. My printer, which prints "randomly" and my desire to have my new digital camera w

Using LVM partitions

I'm trying to boot up to my new LFS 6.0 partition which is a LVM logical volume, but I am getting this: ...(snipped) device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl (2003-12-10 initialised: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...(snipped) VFS: Cannot open root device "VolGroup00/LFS" or unknown-block(0,0) Please append a correct "root

Spam filtering on the mailing lists

Hi everyone! I finally got around to updating the SpamAssasin rulesets for the mailing lists today (thanks to Jim Gifford for giving me explicit instructions!). I'd be interested to know if you: 1) Notice a significant decrease in the levels of spam on the lists 2) Continue to receive spam 3

Re: make error binutils pass 1

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, James Lytle wrote: > I am getting an error in section 5.4 Binutils-2.15.91.0.2 - Pass 1. > Everything seems to work correctly, and I don't notice anything other > than warnings, until the very last line, as follows: > That sounds as if you are following the 6.0 book, except

make error binutils pass 1

I am having a problem that I am sure has been dealt with many times. I am not new to Linux, just not as knowledgable as I should be, therefore this project! I am getting an error in section 5.4 Binutils-2.15.91.0.2 - Pass 1. Everything seems to work correctly, and I don't notice anything other

Re: Error Compiling GCC (1st Pass) in LFS 6.0

Alexander Darino wrote: genmodes.o errors.o ../libiberty/libiberty.a /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc collect2: ld returned 1 exist status http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#cannot-find-lc Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FA

Error Compiling GCC (1st Pass) in LFS 6.0

I followed the instructions exactly, and in order. When I finnally typed "make BOOT_LDFLAGS="-static" bootstrap" It compiles normally, until the very end where it says " genmodes.o errors.o ../libiberty/libiberty.a /tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc collect2: ld returned 1 exist s

Re: ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Roel Kluin wrote: > > > > That is your problem - this file is dated in the future, which causes > >acl.c to be remade, only as user 'dummy' you lack permission. > > Ok I somehow overlooked that. The change in time is due to the fact that > when I had to choose a timezone I f

Re: ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

That is your problem - this file is dated in the future, which causes acl.c to be remade, only as user 'dummy' you lack permission. Ok I somehow overlooked that. The change in time is due to the fact that when I had to choose a timezone I found out that the date of my computer was wrong. I h

Re: ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote these words on 06/30/05 10:30 CST: > > > This is the testing book ? Did you change the versions of any > > packages ? > > Actually, it appears this is the development (unstable) version of > LFS (gathered from the GCC version). This v

Re: ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

Ken Moffat wrote these words on 06/30/05 10:30 CST: > This is the testing book ? Did you change the versions of any > packages ? Actually, it appears this is the development (unstable) version of LFS (gathered from the GCC version). This version of LFS is intended for experienced builders, who

Re: Questions on 5.13. GCC-3.4.1 - Pass 2

Hi DrAce, > 1) The result of expect -c "spawn ls" is correct. > > 2) As specified in the book, you have tu run the > command in the > directory where the packages where extracted. So for > gcc-3.4.1 in > /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-3.4.1 Noted with thanks Now continued up to 5.14. Binutils-2.15.91.0.2

Re: ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Roel Kluin wrote: > Thanks for your time to read this. I really like LFS book, its a good source > of information on this operating system. > after a "make -k check", I got the error stated directly below. Not sure > whether this was a serious problem, I continued, but wasn't

ch. 6.14: GCC-3.4.4 `make -k check' and coreutils dummy failure

Thanks for your time to read this. I really like LFS book, its a good source of information on this operating system. after a "make -k check", I got the error stated directly below. Not sure whether this was a serious problem, I continued, but wasn't able to make the dummy in the next chapter (C

Re: Questions on 5.13. GCC-3.4.1 - Pass 2

1) The result of expect -c "spawn ls" is correct. 2) As specified in the book, you have tu run the command in the directory where the packages where extracted. So for gcc-3.4.1 in /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-3.4.1 2005/6/30, Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi folks, > > 5.13. GCC-3.4.1 - Pass 2 > h

Re: Make GCC LFS6

I re-do all from 6.9 but the headers was from the package specified in the book. For the toolchain, I just make the test with dummy.c. It was all right. So I install binutils... no problem. But after the gcc install, the a.out give me /tools/lib, etc. Can I just correct the gcc spec files and go fu

Re: Init acting the maggot?

Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:43:49PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > > > Should I choose a 2.6 kernel, the loadkeys script doesn't start, and > > I get this curious messing with no cursor. > > To me it smells like a framebuffer issue. Ok, here is (

Re: M$ mouse and xorg

Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:35 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote: > > Useful to know. So the /dev/input thing is simply specifying the > > protocol, and the device node can vary. > > As I understand it, the kernel provides a standard input framework, > wher

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

David Jensen wrote: Ulf Seltmann wrote: This is probably a Pkgconfig-0.17.x problem, get 0.18 http://pkgconfig.freedesktop.org/releases/pkgconfig-0.18.tar.gz Alternately, if you want to keep pkgconfig-0.17.x, you could: sed -i.bak \ 's:-lgtkmm-2.4:& -lgdkmm-2.4 -lpangomm-1.4 -latkmm-1.6:'

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

Not sure if my other post went through... having a weird network problem... You may want to look into gtkmm " gtkmm is the official C++ interface for the popular GUI library GTK+. Highlights include typesafe callbacks, widgets extensible via inheritance and a comprehensive set of widgets. You ca

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

On 6/30/05, Ulf Seltmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you have an undefined reference to libgtkmm you probably need to install gtkmm: http://www.gtkmm.org/ The mm stands for minus minus (--) I think ;) " gtkmm is the official C++ interface for the popular GUI library GTK+. Highlights include t

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

Ulf Seltmann wrote: since some days i try to install the supportlibraries libglademm-2.6 and libgnomecanvasmm-2.10, but i always get the make-errors attached. This is probably a Pkgconfig-0.17.x problem, get 0.18 http://pkgconfig.freedesktop.org/releases/pkgconfig-0.18.tar.gz

Questions on 5.13. GCC-3.4.1 - Pass 2

Hi folks, 5.13. GCC-3.4.1 - Pass 2 http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter05/gcc-pass2.html 1) In which directory to perform following test; expect -c "spawn ls" patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-3.4.1-no_fixincludes-1.patch patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-3.4.1-specs-1.patch I tried follows without suc

Re[7]: English for you! Alexandrova

Добрый день! Весь английский для Вас! Приходите и узучайте разговорный английский. У нас скидки!!! Наши телефоны в Москве: один-ноль-пять 5186 один-пять-шесть и четыре нуля Shrestha Geiger Brown Hummel Wilcox Steffens Azer Chariot Hernadi -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Held on 5.9. Adjusting the Toolchain

Hi steve, - snip - > Directly above the make -C ld install command is the > following sentence: > > > The linker, adjusted at the end of the first pass of > Binutils, is > installed by running the following command from > within the > binutils-build directory: > Noted with thanks Con

Re: Held on 5.9. Adjusting the Toolchain

On 6/30/05, Stephen Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I encountered problem on > > 5.9. Adjusting the Toolchain > http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter05/adjusting.html > > I tried following steps; > > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ make -C ld install > make: *

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words > Ulf Seltmann sagte: > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the > > above information page > Sorry for the bad posting. I'll try again ... with another m

Held on 5.9. Adjusting the Toolchain

Hi folks, I encountered problem on 5.9. Adjusting the Toolchain http://www.sg.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.0/chapter05/adjusting.html I tried following steps; lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ make -C ld install make: *** ld: No such file or directory. Stop. lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-buil

Re: Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

Ulf Seltmann sagte: > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page Sorry for the bad posting. I'll try again ... with another mailer ;) Hello Group, since some days i try to instal

Problems building libglademm or libgnomecanvasmm (undefined reference in libgtkmm-2.4)

error.mail Description: Binary data libglademm-2.log Description: Binary data libgnomecanvasmm-2.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: M$ mouse and xorg

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:35 +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote: > Useful to know. So the /dev/input thing is simply specifying the > protocol, and the device node can vary. As I understand it, the kernel provides a standard input framework, where any mouse on the system shows up as /dev/input/mouse0, mo

Re: cannot amend the GCC specs with SED script in '5.8. Adjusting the Toolchain'

I must have forgotten something cause the second try it worked. picobyte -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: A question on 5.8. Glibc-2.3.4-20040701

> >lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ localedef -i de_DE > >-f ISO-8859-1 de_DE > >Segmentation fault > > > >Is it a warning? Any mistake committed? "Segmentation fault" is a read or write attempt at a memory segment not allowed to that process. IIRC Windows calls it: " caused a general protection