Andreas Fehr wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2005, 13:19, lin q (as lq) wrote:
lq: I am in Chapter 6 and compiling ncurses. After "make install",
lq: there are some instructions about moving the libncurses.so.5* from
lq: /usr/lib to /lib.
lq:
lq: I wonder why it is wrong that these libraries are in /us
Phillip Fynan wrote:
I'll try again with the LFS live cd, The one I have is scratched.
Not able to download the iso and burn again?
--
Jeremy Huntwork
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
I'm trying to find a distro that: fits on one cd and will build LFS
out of the box.
I have RedHat 9 (2.4 kernel, so forget it)
VectorLinux (Slackware based, Doesn't like to build gcc. The tools for
some reason are i486-pc-slackware.)
Core (2.4 kernel, forget it.)
Current Distro under the headlights
thorsten schrieb:
Hello all,
I have a lfs-router with two ethernet cards, which connects via pppoe
on eth0 to my adsl provider. eth1 has 192.168.0.1/24, my private
subnet. On the subnet is 192.168.0.3, named linux. Now the following
problem arises and I have no clue what is wrong:
With adsl dis
On Tue, 10 May 2005, 13:19, lin q (as lq) wrote:
> lq: I am in Chapter 6 and compiling ncurses. After "make install",
> lq: there are some instructions about moving the libncurses.so.5* from
> lq: /usr/lib to /lib.
> lq:
> lq: I wonder why it is wrong that these libraries are in /usr/lib? If
>
Sorry I did not mention that in my host Fedora Core -1, these libraries are
in /usr/lib, not /lib. This is the reason I want to confirm this.
Thanks.
From: "lin q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: LFS Support List
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: ncurses libraries:why they are moved
Da
Hi,
I am in Chapter 6 and compiling ncurses. After "make install", there are
some instructions about moving the libncurses.so.5* from /usr/lib to /lib.
I wonder why it is wrong that these libraries are in /usr/lib? If I do not
do this, then when I compile some other application ncurses librari
lin q wrote:
My question is does Ada get compiled in the 2nd build?
No. Basically, the chapter 5 '--without-ada' option is a safeguard
against those hosts that might have an ada compiler installed. By
specifiying the option, we ensure that the ./configure script doesn't
try to find an ada co
Hi,
I wonder how to understand the difference of compiling ncurses on ada
option.
In "Constructing a temporary system", in building ncurses, the config
option is like this,
./configure --prefix=/tools --with-shared --without-debug --without-ada
--enable-overwrite
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 17:00 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Ming Zhang wrote:
> > ok, then let us reduce the range. how to verify the basic packages like
> > binutils, glibc and gcc is correct? or 90% correct? as long as the test
> > like "make check" or "make test" passed?
> >
>
> Just because a p
luis jure wrote:
i have recently purchased a laptop with windows xp pre-installed
(obviously...). for various reasons i haven't wiped it out yet to install
linux. before i do that, i have some files that i need to transfer to and
from my desktop, which has an oldish lfs 5.1 (plus much of blfs, of c
Ming Zhang wrote:
ok, then let us reduce the range. how to verify the basic packages like
binutils, glibc and gcc is correct? or 90% correct? as long as the test
like "make check" or "make test" passed?
Just because a package builds and passes all the tests doesn't tell you that it won't
cause pro
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:21 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, 9 May 2005, Ming Zhang wrote:
>
> > > (ii) build _every_ blfs package you care about.
> > >
> > but one thing here is if you can build it, can you make sure it can run
> > well? especially for some packages that come with no self check
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Ming Zhang wrote:
> > (ii) build _every_ blfs package you care about.
> >
> but one thing here is if you can build it, can you make sure it can run
> well? especially for some packages that come with no self check option.
>
That's why I said every package you care about. I a
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:42:55AM -0500, Chris De Varennes enlightened
us thusly
> I was curious about something. If one wanted to create as inclusive a
> BLFS system as possible (starting with an LFS 6.0 system and
> installing basically everything in the BLFS 6.0 book that isn't
> completely re
thorsten wrote:
Joel Miller wrote:
thorsten wrote:
Hello all,
I have a lfs-router with two ethernet cards, which connects via pppoe
on eth0 to my adsl provider. eth1 has 192.168.0.1/24, my private
subnet. On the subnet is 192.168.0.3, named linux. Now the following
problem arises and I have no c
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 11:42 -0500, Chris De Varennes wrote:
> I was curious about something. If one wanted to create as inclusive a
> BLFS system as possible (starting with an LFS 6.0 system and installing
> basically everything in the BLFS 6.0 book that isn't completely
> redundant), has anyon
Phillip Fynan wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows of a distribution that uses 1 cd and is
known to work for building LFS.
Thanks.
I use Ubuntu. You need to apt-get install gcc, bison and flex so you need a network
connection but it does the job for me
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/lis
18 matches
Mail list logo
