Re: Building on 2.4 kernel

2005-05-01 Thread Phillip Fynan
On 5/1/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phillip Fynan wrote: > > OK, Thanks anyway. > > I guess I can try hacking out an upgrade to my RedHat 9 system that > > doesn't quite work (I'm lazy and quite a newbie - read: first time > > rebuilding the kernel), or using the LFS live CD. > >

Re: Building on 2.4 kernel

2005-05-01 Thread Andrew Benton
Phillip Fynan wrote: OK, Thanks anyway. I guess I can try hacking out an upgrade to my RedHat 9 system that doesn't quite work (I'm lazy and quite a newbie - read: first time rebuilding the kernel), or using the LFS live CD. It would be cool if that really did work, though. You would be wise to nai

Re: stuck at configuring binutils

2005-05-01 Thread Matthew Burgess
Ken Moffat wrote: I'm a little uncertain which version to point you at, I think Matt was going to fix up some minor issues, so maybe the 'testing-20050428' is the closest we've got to a 6.1 release. Yeah, I've been really pressed for time just recently. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/tes

Re: Building on 2.4 kernel

2005-05-01 Thread Phillip Fynan
OK, Thanks anyway. I guess I can try hacking out an upgrade to my RedHat 9 system that doesn't quite work (I'm lazy and quite a newbie - read: first time rebuilding the kernel), or using the LFS live CD. It would be cool if that really did work, though. -- Phillip Fynan -- http://linuxfromscratc

Re: Building on 2.4 kernel

2005-05-01 Thread Andrew Benton
Phillip Fynan wrote: I know in the system requirements it lists a 2.6 kernel for udev to work, but I was wondering if I could build most of the packages on my 2.4 kernel and upgrade for the final steps? It would save a lot of effort before I get started, but will it work? You'd pay for it later tho