.
Would it be OK to change this symlink to point to the newly installed ld
in /usr/bin? Or is the /tools search path still needed?
Thanks,
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is
always declared, since it is required by C89.
It's required by C89, but deprecated in C99, and removed in C11 -- and
glibc follows C11 by removing the declaratio
> The patch changes stdio.h so that even in C11 gets() is defined, but
> adds __attribute__ ((error("gets() is dangerous. Don't use it."))) to
> both gets() in stdio.h and bits/stdio2.h.
__gets_chk() in bits/stdio2.h
> The advantage from my point of view is that there is no "not defined"
> error
nd binutils/gcc pass build against the new
libc.
I am sure, there are better solutions to the c++ problem, but this works
for me.
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello, I am experimenting a bit with the toolchain in chapter 5 and was
looking into the configure script of binutils, wondering what happens
with the --with-lib-path argument. however I couldn't find that this
argument is parsed at all by configure. Am I wrong?
regards thorsten
--
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/12/06, thorsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, I am experimenting a bit with the toolchain in chapter 5 and was
>> looking into the configure script of binutils, wondering what happens
>> with the --with-lib-path argument. howeve
ardless of -fno-stack-protector or not. I will have a closer
look within the next 1 or two days, keep you updated.
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
$ ping www.goole.de
ping: ping must run as root
can't init ping: Operation not permitted
Every SUID program is potentially dangerous. However, I don't want to
start a flamewar about this...
Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
hope this helps, regards thorsten
--- lfs-bootscripts-6.2/lfs/init.d/functions.orig 2006-03-22
02:02:32.0 +0100
+++ lfs-bootscripts-6.2/lfs/init.d/functions2006-10-31 14:58:51.0
+0100
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
for pid in ${lpids}
> This is the same problem Alexander mentioned the other day, I believe.
>
> Alex :-)
>
>
Oh sorry, I thought my problem is so wheired I didn't look for threads
on the list.
regards Thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linu
That would be the
earliest possible time.
thorsten
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ent, which looks like:
all:
CFLAGS=something
CXXFLAGS=
gcc:
CFLAGS=some other
.
grub:
..
end
Nice tool to play with, thank you
Regards Thorsten Happel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
12 matches
Mail list logo
