Hello,I looked through the mailing list to see any mention of patches for
MPFR 2.4.1 but didn't see any mention.
I am looking at MPFR's page about the current release:
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/
There is a "Bugs" section on the web page that mentions 5 fixed bugs with a
patch. My reading o
the link below:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1297332318&k=Z4L2Z4UXTVTF2EGES1Z5Q&r
lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org was invited to join Facebook by Troy Will. If you
do not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future, please
click on the link below to unsubscri
This patch also fails.
svn info:
Last Changed Rev: 9354
Last Changed Date: 2010-08-10 13:45:14 -0700 (Tue, 10 Aug 2010)
Regards,
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Matthew Burgess <
matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> I just committed a fix for this (see #2738), and verified it now:
>
> $ wget
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-makefile_fix-1.patch
> --2010-08-11 20:52:51--
> http://ww
>
> Does this sed work for you? (it does the same thing as the patch)
>
> sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n\t$(make-target-directory)\n\ttouch $...@\n\n$/' \
> manual/Makefile
>
> Andy
Thanks for your input Andy, but I didn't even try. I ran jhalfs and glibc
was built without a hitch. The only thing I can
Prior to the recent upgrade to vim 7.3 mention was made of optional
unpacking of vim-7.x-lang.tar.gz. For example, "First, unpack both
vim-7.2.tar.bz2 and (optionally) vim-7.2-lang.tar.gz archives into the
same directory." However, any mention of vim-7.3-lang.tar.gz in
vim.xml has been removed. Is
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:25 AM, 侯红勋 wrote:
> Runtime files are included in the main tarball now. There are no
> separate extra and lang tar ball now.
Thanks. I'll report it to the jhalfs list. The lang tarball was hard coded in.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http
Hello,
Are there some missing kernel device rules in 55-lfs.rules from
udev-config-20080217?
These following rules do not exist:
KERNEL=="ptmx", MODE="0666",GROUP="tty"
KERNEL=="kmem", MODE="0640",GROUP="kmem"
KERNEL=="mem", MODE="0640",GROUP="kmem"
KERNEL=="port", MODE
Hello,
Are there some missing kernel device rules in 55-lfs.rules from
udev-config-20080217?
These following rules do not exist:
KERNEL=="ptmx", MODE="0666",GROUP="tty"
KERNEL=="kmem", MODE="0640",GROUP="kmem"
KERNEL=="mem", MODE="0640",GROUP="kmem"
KERNEL=="port", MODE
