On Mar 9, 2010, at 6:12, Matthew Burgess
wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:28:24 +0100 (CET),
> tho...@equinox.homelinux.org wrote:
>> Because 4.4.1 has been released, I started another try to setup KDE4.
>> LFS-6.6 is out so a crystal clear and modern basis seems to be a good
>> start for this test
e to
kde4, otherwise it might seem like BLFS is becoming obsolete :-\
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever tried Linux? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ugh,
> and as
> others have pointed out, walking away from the behemoth that is KDE
> now is
> an option open to anyone, like me, who's had enough of the bloat.
>
>
That's probably a good idea, in the end. Let's just keep kde3. The
farthest I go for databases in kde is sqlite.
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever tried Linux? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi all,
I've been wondering if the lfs LSB bootscripts are being maintained,
since I want to use them and integrate them with plymouth for a
bootsplash. (I have no idea how to do this, any tips would be great).
Are the bootscripts being maintained?
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever tried
rtually any given thing, is almost always inversely proportional
> to its'
> degree of popularity.
>
Yes, but after building LFS a few times, you come to appreciate
package management. Jhalfs does this nicely, but as I recall, many
things are broken with jhalfs at the moment :(
-
make a decision. Please. We can talk about the development with
other distributions another time, at least AFTER 6.6 is released.
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever tried Linux? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
gt;
> Looking at the archive sorted by date the last previous was
> on March 19, so that's about right for me.
>
>
I'm just having the problem of getting all the emails about 6-10 hours
late. Like now, I just got an email sent at 10:24 AM, and it's 5:38 PM now.
> Mi
I'm looking at F-13 bzip2
spec file, and they kept the library version back at 1.0.4.
I don't see any issues reported to the bugzilla in fedora, so i'm
guessing this was something minor...
> I suppose I should go look to see if the maintainer is aware of it...
>
> --
&g
edIn, it tries
> really hard to send invitations to everyone in your contacts. He may
> have done this inadvertently without realizing everyone it was being
> sent to.
>
This is why i never let any online service into my contact list. :P
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever Tried Linux? :)
--
http://l
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:55, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I added a new image to the lfs home page.
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
looks cool! :)
>
> -- Bruce
> --
--
Cya Later,
Robert Xu
Ever tried Linux? :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
#x27;s expect becomes (pretty much)
obsolete?
Is there any alternative to expect?
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
distributions already use upstart (Ubuntu, Fedora) or will use it
> in future (openSUSE, Debian).
>
> What are you thinking about that?
>
Sounds nice, but maybe wait?
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 14:49, Sebastian Plotz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 06.07.2010, 14:09 -0400 schrieb Robert Xu:
>> But that requires SysVinit tools.
>
> Did you mean halt, init, runlevel, shutdown, telinit, ...? They are all
> included in Upstart, too.
>
> Upstart is
d explain what it offers for an LFS
> system, then that will help the discussion a lot.
>
> Note that if you are concerned about boot speed, my SVN system gets a
> bash prompt in about 8 seconds.
>
> Offering Upstart in BLFS may be an option too.
BLFS sounds like a good place to
TZxjm3y+ip6tByRo0BZRWcvQQz178UR3kZF5ekMIm2W5LR+X0qcEf9D2rMztAs5D
> f7IeixflehJcC5DBL8qreifHjkUrlaryvrcV/HoEigudAwKqjw8SsaeIO+BEYt3J
> Naa2R6W4cxVUVR4XqoT/
> =PnVS
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content, and i
nto the box or tries to print something).
>> That sounds quite interesting. I run cupsd all the time but I haven't
>> printed anything in weeks.
>
> See xinetd in BLFS.
>
So why can't we put it in BLFS? I'd just wait for until fedora tries
out their systemd.
ommunity.linuxfromscratch.org
>
> I personally think this would be a nice replacement for both trac and the
> main site.
That looks pretty good for a replacement of the aging LFS site.
>
> --
> JH
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
>
On Jul 25, 2010, at 1:33, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 12:53 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> If we were setting up a new project, I might want to use Redmine,
>> but we
>> manage LFS using Subversion, Mailman, and Trac and have been using
>> those
>> tools for about 6 years. The main w
hmm...
On Jul 27, 2010, at 6:06, Yaacov-Yoseph Weiss
wrote:
> O.k. I'll jump in and risk the consequences...
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Jeremy Huntwork
> wrote:
>> It's interesting what logs will show.
>>
>> For instance, the access logs for community.linuxfromscratch.org
>> show 117
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
Maybe see what commands they used to build SysVinit? They may have
supplied a parameter we don't.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
oftware on
their own and learn the inner workings of a Linux system without any
PM or heavy dependency "crap".
(a small version of DSL? lol)
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi all,
Would I be allowed to post annoucements of project releases here?
(That pertain to (A|B|C|H)LFS (very very much))
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:59, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
Sure.
Or I can send you the announcement.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ow what you mean by this ? It's the first time I've heard
> the phrase "dynamic boot script". I hope this isn't anything to do
> with upstart or systemd, what I've seen of those fills me with a
> mixture of horror and disgust ;)
>
The LSB bootscripts work
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 19:02, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>>
>> The LSB bootscripts work similar to insserv on (newer) Debian and SuSE,
>> right?
>
> Yeah. Instead of hardcoding the symlink order as is done in
for years and what Debian Squeeze and on is using.
Or, you could just symlink all the initscripts to a rc location in
/usr/sbin/rc
like /usr/sbin/rcnetwork for tab completion.
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rence for the future. I'm eager to hear about this :D
--
later, Robert Xu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi all,
As brought up somewhere on the openSUSE mailing list,
http://lwn.net/Articles/490413/.
Will LFS continue to avoid systemd? Because udev will still be
buildable on its own.
--
later daze. :: Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http
28 matches
Mail list logo
