Hi everyone,
I just stumbled on a little problem compiling an LFS system following
the instructions in the development version of the book.
In chapter 6.13 (GMP) it tells CFLAGS users to add ABI to their CFLAGS
variable, but the configure script doesn't recognize that. It only
searches for ABI eith
> If you reread the note, it says "and you have specified CFLAGS in the
> environment...". That *is* an environment variable.
Sorry, perhaps I didn't make clear what I meant exactly.
After reading the note, I ran
export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -ABI=32"
which didn't work. If you look in the configure
> Of course. The instruction is wrong. Try
>
>export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS ABI=32"
>
> just like the instruction says.
>
I wouldn't bug the list if I hadn't already tried that. Please take
a look at the following log:
root:/sources/gmp-4.3.1# ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-cxx --enable-mpb
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:15:28 +0200, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> Your problem here is not the ABI variable, your problem is the fact that
> it can't find a working copy of GCC. Why this is I can't tell you,
> you'll have to check your PATH and backtrace your steps. See the
> attached log, on a 64-bit s
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:33:34 +0200, Guy Dalziel
wrote:
> Correction, after some additional tests it does seem that ABI=32 in the
> CFLAGS causes it to not find a working compiler. It didn't pick up the
> CFLAGS values on the first test for some reason. My previous email
> provides the solution
--- Forwarded message ---
From: "Philipp Christian Loewner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Cc:
Subject: Re: asm/page.h
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:20:53 +0200
Hi there,
Hopefully this is not going to be a double post.
Sorry for just stum
Hi everyone!
After completing my school's final
exams, I found time to do the LFS build.
Here is a quick summary:
I used the development LFS book version 20080423
but the newest available packages.
As for the system specs, it is a 32bit system running
the actual LFS live CD at build time.
I don'
On Thu, 08 May 2008 22:47:42 +0200, Ag. D. Hatzimanikas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Years ago, I suggested a whole chapter or a new book, for the Kernel
> related stuff [boot process (init ...), udev, filesystems, virtual
> machines, etc...].
> We did also found the man (Alexander) who could a
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:37:30 +0200, William Immendorf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> REOPEN TRAC TICKET #2213 IMMENDALY AND LET MY HAVE MY TRAC PRIVLAGES
> BACK TOO!
> _
> See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun
f you actually happen to be a troll, please forget what you have just
read and replace it with plonk.
Regards
- Philipp Christian Loewner
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:15:43 +0200, Randy McMurchy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Best I can tell the GMP package needs M4 to build successfully.
> This can be approached in one of two ways:
>
> 1. Build M4 before building GMP in Chapter 5 (in fact it may
> be needed to be built before
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:17:01 +0200, Jeremy Huntwork
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just curious, what was the rationale behind building gmp and mpfr in
> different manners within the same book? To be more specific, why let
> GCC build them internally for its own use on GCC pass1 and then bui
12 matches
Mail list logo
