Hi,
When building the systemd branch of LFS, one of the coreutils
tests fails:
FAIL: tests/df/skip-rootfs.sh
That test is skipped if `df' exits with nonzero code. This is
what happens on trunk LFS, because /etc/mtab is empty.
Now, on systemd branch, /etc/mtab is a symbolic link to
/proc/self/moun
Starting a new thread since the original subject was not about an ISO.
William Harrington wrote:
> I have been updating the 6.3 livecd for 7.x releases. It can also be
> used to build previous releases.
>
> I spent the afternoon and evening updating and testing the current
> updated livecd
On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We need to get that on a different server that has better download
speed. I'm getting it now and it's a 30 minute process at about
200-300
KB/s. Downloads from anduin are at 1 MB/s.
Not sure what your connection was like, but I get it betwe
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> We need to get that on a different server that has better download
>> speed. I'm getting it now and it's a 30 minute process at about 200-300
>> KB/s. Downloads from anduin are at 1 MB/s.
>
> Not sure what your con
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Starting a new thread since the original subject was not about an ISO.
>
> William Harrington wrote:
>
> > I have been updating the 6.3 livecd for 7.x releases. It can also be
> > used to build previous releases.
> >
> > I spent the afternoon and evening updating and testi
On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Minimum ISO
Grep-2.5.1a 2.5.1 (not sure if that is really 2.5.1a or not)
Packages built for the livecd are from LFS 6.3 and BLFS 6.3 which used
grep 2.5.1a.
Since 7.1, all I did was update programs to meet or exceed the host
system r
William Harrington wrote:
>
> On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Minimum ISO
>> Grep-2.5.1a 2.5.1 (not sure if that is really 2.5.1a or not)
>
> Packages built for the livecd are from LFS 6.3 and BLFS 6.3 which used
> grep 2.5.1a.
> Since 7.1, all I did was update programs
On 18 March 2013 14:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I agree, but at least that is a good baseline that checks the host
> requirements that are currently published.
Focusing on the more modern, I hadn't considered that priority for the
development of the book. The Host System Requirements and version
cybertao wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 14:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> I agree, but at least that is a good baseline that checks the host
>> requirements that are currently published.
>
> Focusing on the more modern, I hadn't considered that priority for the
> development of the book. The Host System
