On Wednesday 03 October 2012 19:31:14 Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> I remember some ... long and IMO insane thread on the systemd-devel list
> about something like this. The end result of that thread was that
> "startx" is apparently not supposed to be used anymore, at least not in
> its default configur
On Tuesday 02 October 2012 10:51:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Did you ever run 'mount' from the command line?
I configured the kernel without any of the cgroup controllers and now only one
cgroup (the systemd cgroup) shows up when issuing the mount command.
My kernel config:
CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
# CONFIG
Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2012 10:51:32 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Did you ever run 'mount' from the command line?
>
> I configured the kernel without any of the cgroup controllers and now only one
> cgroup (the systemd cgroup) shows up when issuing the mount command.
>
> My kernel c
On Monday 08 October 2012 12:28:31 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Interesting. Other than allowing systemd to run, what benefits does
> using cgroups give?
>From Wikipedia:
cgroups (control groups) is a Linux kernel feature to limit, account and
isolate resource usage (CPU, memory, disk I/O, etc.) of proc
Ragnar Thomsen wrote:
> On Monday 08 October 2012 12:28:31 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Interesting. Other than allowing systemd to run, what benefits does
>> using cgroups give?
>
>>From Wikipedia:
> cgroups (control groups) is a Linux kernel feature to limit, account and
> isolate resource usage (CPU,
Hi,
Just to know: where is it better to propose hints? It seems this here
was uploaded (great!), whereas this I suggested on hints mailing list is
not and without any comment. Did I misunderstand some steps?
Thanks,
Best regards,
-
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Président de l'associatio
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to know: where is it better to propose hints? It seems this here
> was uploaded (great!), whereas this I suggested on hints mailing list is
> not and without any comment. Did I misunderstand some steps?
We don't have as many developers as we used to have
Hi,
The French LFS Team, in particular Denis, has just written a hint about
replacing grub with syslinux as bootloader. We translated the text.
Would be interesting for hints project? If it is not, no problem, just cool to
know why.
Thanks for your opinion,
Best regards,
--
Jean-Philippe MEN
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The French LFS Team, in particular Denis, has just written a hint about
> replacing grub with syslinux as bootloader. We translated the text.
> Would be interesting for hints project? If it is not, no problem, just cool
> to know why.
I did some editing for
Excellent. Thanks. The author will be happy. I'm not surprised with
spelling problems as I translated from French and quickly. Thanks for
your review. I hope it'll holp some people.
Best regards,
-
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Président de l'association traduc.org
Coordinateur du
This is a continuation of the thread Boot and shutdown timing.
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> If you use /dev/sd??, then I wish you the best of luck the next time
> the kernel's disk discovery order changes. Because it's not
> guaranteed to remain the same forever, and so when it changes, your
> syst
11 matches
Mail list logo
