Re: [lfs-dev] Stripping libraries

2012-09-03 Thread Tobias Gasser
Am 31.08.2012 19:35, schrieb Nathan Coulson: >> i'll write about the results as soon as the build is done. i now have (almost) finished my system. xfce is up with firefox and thunderbird. only libreoffice and vlc are missing - but that's another story ;) everything is fine, no errors occurred

[lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread John Burrell
My build scripts use su to install chapter 6, using the package user management system. Not now they don't! coreutils no longer installs su. Instead util-linux-2.22-? will provide su. But util-linux will need a PAM header file to build su. So is this end of su as we know (and love?) it in LFS

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
John Burrell wrote: > > My build scripts use su to install chapter 6, using the package user > management system. > > Not now they don't! > > coreutils no longer installs su. Instead util-linux-2.22-? will provide su. > > But util-linux will need a PAM header file to build su. > > So is this end o

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread William Harrington
On Sep 3, 2012, at 15:48 PM, John Burrell wrote: > My build scripts use su to install chapter 6, using the package > user management system. > > Not now they don't! > > coreutils no longer installs su. Instead util-linux-2.22-? will > provide su. > > But util-linux will need a PAM header file

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread Bryan Kadzban
John Burrell wrote: > coreutils no longer installs su. As others said, LFS now uses su from shadow. However, this doesn't help you, because there is no chapter-5 shadow installation, and adding its dependencies might be problematic. What *may* help you is a return to the package-user hint as it

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bryan Kadzban wrote: > John Burrell wrote: >> coreutils no longer installs su. > > As others said, LFS now uses su from shadow. We've installed su from shadow for as long as I recall. It's not new. > However, this doesn't help > you, because there is no chapter-5 shadow installation, and adding

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread Firerat
On Sep 4, 2012 4:50 AM, "Bruce Dubbs" @ gmail.com > wrote: > > Bryan Kadzban wrote: > > John Burrell wrote: > >> coreutils no longer installs su. > > > > As others said, LFS now uses su from shadow. > > We've installed su from shadow for as long as I recall. It's not new. > > > However, this doesn

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Firerat" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 4 Septembre 2012 07:14:34 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su ... > > It has been too long since I last played around with it, but looking > at my scripts I > > ln -sv su-tools /tools/bin/su >