[lfs-dev] ISC DHCP Client and Server change.

2012-08-14 Thread Armin K.
Hello there. I've just finished upgrading ISC DHCP to latest version and did some major improvements to the server boot script and client network service. I did not, however, test the network service because I don't have ifup/ifdown from LFS. DHCP Server script seems to work. If there's anyone

[lfs-dev] gcc tests

2012-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
In the latest gcc, the regression tests are pretty good. I did need to increase the stack size again to handle the torture tests, but the only FAIL that I get is in the well known and documented libmudflap (libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx). When I examine the test log, I do get an Error early:

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0 [ test-installation.pl ]

2012-08-14 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:21:44AM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Fun fun fun. :-) > > Andrew Benton wrote: > > test-installation.pl failed with an error: > > > > root:/sources/glibc-2.16.0# CC="gcc" /usr/bin/perl > > scripts/test-installation.pl /sources/glibc-build/ > > Unmatched ( in regex; m

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0 [ test-installation.pl ]

2012-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
> Bryan, you were perspicacious. I've just spent a few hours > re-energising my limited perl knowledge. First, to try to > instrument test-installation.pl, then to understand what is > happening. > > When the ld.so regexp triggers on x86_64, the line contains: > ld.so-version=$(if $(abi-64-ld

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0 [ test-installation.pl ]

2012-08-14 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:31:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > When the ld.so regexp triggers on x86_64, the line contains: > > ld.so-version=$(if $(abi-64-ld-soname),$(abi-64-ld-soname),ld.so.1) > > > > My initial reaction when I saw that was unprintable - I still have > > no idea where

Re: [lfs-dev] Glibc-2.16.0 [ test-installation.pl ]

2012-08-14 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:31:36PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>>When the ld.so regexp triggers on x86_64, the line contains: >>> ld.so-version=$(if $(abi-64-ld-soname),$(abi-64-ld-soname),ld.so.1) >>> >>>My initial reaction when I saw that was unprintable - I still h