On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 15:57 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Attached is the latest set of files for extracting udev from systemd.
> It should work for LFS and BLFS.
>
>
> Let me know if you spot any issues.
Bruce, thanks very much for tackling this, and to Armin for his valuable
input. I tested t
> The patch changes stdio.h so that even in C11 gets() is defined, but
> adds __attribute__ ((error("gets() is dangerous. Don't use it."))) to
> both gets() in stdio.h and bits/stdio2.h.
__gets_chk() in bits/stdio2.h
> The advantage from my point of view is that there is no "not defined"
> error
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matt Burgess wrote:
>> It's as Andy Benton brought up. There's a fair number of packages,
>> starting with chapter 5's diffutils, that still use or at least
>> reference gets(), which has been removed from this version of Glibc.
> +Index: diffutils-3.2/lib/stdio.in.h
> +
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 17:10 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > Matt Burgess wrote:
>
> >> It's as Andy Benton brought up. There's a fair number of packages,
> >> starting with chapter 5's diffutils, that still use or at least
> >> reference gets(), which has been removed from this
Adding the following to glibc-2.16 in Chapter 6 seems to work:
sed -i -e 's::"rpc/types.h"' sunrpc/rpc_clntout.c
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 23:37 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
> However, being a perfectionist, I wasn't happy with
> them hence taking so long over the upgrade. I'm after the 'correct' way
> of dealing with this, which seems to be patching gnulib.
Here's the work in progress patch. It still wants to i
Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 23:37 +0100, Matt Burgess wrote:
>> However, being a perfectionist, I wasn't happy with
>> them hence taking so long over the upgrade. I'm after the 'correct' way
>> of dealing with this, which seems to be patching gnulib.
I will have to disagree with t
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I just ran into the test-installation.pl problem, but think I've found
> a fix for that. I'll post when I get it working.
The scripts/test-installation.pl script is reading
/sources/glibc-build/soversions.mk and looking for the
regular expression /^ld\.so/. This is defined
