Le 14/03/2012 03:02, Andrew Benton a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:37:30 +
> "Gilles Espinasse" wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Andrew Benton"
>> To:
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:05:37 +
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> I have libgfortran, libgo, libffi, libjava, libobjc in the source dir!
> Could it be that
> since you do not have those dirs, configure somehow "forgets" to
> disable target-zlib? Have you tried to build
> with the full source of gcc?
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 23:11 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> With the full gcc-4.6.3 tarball I get the same results as everybody
Wonderful! I'll sleep easier tonight now :-) I'm glad this has finally
been solved.
> The book is still wrong by the way, it
> still has --disable-target-zlib, which th
On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
--- binutils-build-sysroot-libdir/ld/eelf_x86_64.c 2012-03-01
23:31:31.789317951 -0500
+++ binutils-build-nosysroot-nolibdir/ld/eelf_x86_64.c 2012-03-02
00:29:16.11769736
On 3/14/12 7:20 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 23:11 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> With the full gcc-4.6.3 tarball I get the same results as everybody
>
> Wonderful! I'll sleep easier tonight now :-) I'm glad this has finally
> been solved.
Nice! Glad we got that one nailed d
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>>> On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Yes, I saw that. Reviewing.
>>> How is that coming along?
>> Not well, sorry. I've got some personal things going on right now
>> and can't get to it. I'll loo
S30checkfs, we added
# If any LVM based partitions are on the system, ensure they
# are activated so they can be checked/used.
if [ -x /sbin/vgchange ]; then
/sbin/vgchange -a y >/dev/null
fi
Normally, I would suggest that we keep non LFS packages out of the
boots
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Bryan Kadzban
wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, I saw that. Reviewing.
How is that coming along?
>>> Not well, sorry. I've got some perso