Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1

2012-03-14 Thread Pierre Labastie
Le 14/03/2012 03:02, Andrew Benton a écrit : > On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:37:30 + > "Gilles Espinasse" wrote: > >> - Original Message - >> From: "Andrew Benton" >> To: >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:00 PM >> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1 >> >> >>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1

2012-03-14 Thread Andrew Benton
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:05:37 + Pierre Labastie wrote: > I have libgfortran, libgo, libffi, libjava, libobjc in the source dir! > Could it be that > since you do not have those dirs, configure somehow "forgets" to > disable target-zlib? Have you tried to build > with the full source of gcc?

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1

2012-03-14 Thread Matt Burgess
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 23:11 +, Andrew Benton wrote: > With the full gcc-4.6.3 tarball I get the same results as everybody Wonderful! I'll sleep easier tonight now :-) I'm glad this has finally been solved. > The book is still wrong by the way, it > still has --disable-target-zlib, which th

Re: [lfs-dev] Build method revisions

2012-03-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: --- binutils-build-sysroot-libdir/ld/eelf_x86_64.c 2012-03-01 23:31:31.789317951 -0500 +++ binutils-build-nosysroot-nolibdir/ld/eelf_x86_64.c 2012-03-02 00:29:16.11769736

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc cross patch in pass1

2012-03-14 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
On 3/14/12 7:20 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 23:11 +, Andrew Benton wrote: > >> With the full gcc-4.6.3 tarball I get the same results as everybody > > Wonderful! I'll sleep easier tonight now :-) I'm glad this has finally > been solved. Nice! Glad we got that one nailed d

Re: [lfs-dev] Build method revisions

2012-03-14 Thread Bryan Kadzban
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >>> On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Yes, I saw that. Reviewing. >>> How is that coming along? >> Not well, sorry. I've got some personal things going on right now >> and can't get to it. I'll loo

[lfs-dev] LVM in lfs bootscripts

2012-03-14 Thread Nathan Coulson
S30checkfs, we added # If any LVM based partitions are on the system, ensure they # are activated so they can be checked/used. if [ -x /sbin/vgchange ]; then /sbin/vgchange -a y >/dev/null fi Normally, I would suggest that we keep non LFS packages out of the boots

Re: [lfs-dev] Build method revisions

2012-03-14 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Jeremy Huntwork wrote: >> On 3/8/12 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On 3/2/12 11:10 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Yes, I saw that.  Reviewing. How is that coming along? >>> Not well, sorry.  I've got some perso