Qrux wrote:
> Practically, I've had to change to a lower one for PPP connections,
> and higher ones for better gigE throughput. Some people have modems;
> others have machines in a data center.
>
> I don't think it's about the applicability of the setting.
I don't either. I was just saying th
Qrux wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Qrux wrote:
>>
>>> Probably something like:
>>>
>>> BRIDGE_PORTS="eth0 eth1"
>> It's getting complicated. We then need to consider address1, dhcp2,
>> etc. What we have now works for kvm, but a general solution is more
>> d
On Feb 26, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Qrux wrote:
>> On Feb 25, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Qrux wrote:
>>>
Probably something like:
BRIDGE_PORTS="eth0 eth1"
>>> It's getting complicated. We then need to consider address1, dhcp2,
>>> etc. What w
Qrux wrote:
> For 7.2 & beyond...
>
> Bridge-utils is not dissimilar from udev, in that it's a userspace
> tool for a kernel. And, it's certainly no less optional than
> inettools.
I disagree -- assuming by "inettools" you mean "inetutils", because the
former is not in LFS.
hostname is requir
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Qrux wrote:
>> For 7.2 & beyond...
>>
>> Bridge-utils is not dissimilar from udev, in that it's a userspace
>> tool for a kernel. And, it's certainly no less optional than
>> inettools.
>
> I disagree -- assuming by "inettools" you mean "inetutils", because the
> former i
On Feb 26, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Qrux wrote:
>> For 7.2 & beyond...
>>
>> Bridge-utils is not dissimilar from udev, in that it's a userspace
>> tool for a kernel. And, it's certainly no less optional than
>> inettools.
>
> hostname is required for X (it runs "hostname -f"
I was looking at the instructions for util-linux and notice that we use
--enable-arch. Does anyone remember why? When I 'man arch', it says
"arch is a deprecated command since util-linux 2.13. Use uname -m or
use arch from the GNU coreutils package."
I did check coreutils and --enable-ins
Added in 6,4 as follows - but no idea why - perhaps the mailing lists
in this date range will have a clue
•2008-10-11
◦[randy] - Added three configure parameters to the Chapter 6
Util-linux-ng instructions so that additional programs are installed.
Also updated the installed programs list.
On M
Steve Crosby wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I was looking at the instructions for util-linux and notice that we use
>> --enable-arch. Does anyone remember why? When I 'man arch', it says
>> "arch is a deprecated command since util-linux 2.13. Use uname -m or
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 22:50 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Perhaps we should just drop it since neither util-linux nor coreutils
> builds it normally and it probably could be replaced with an alias or
> script that just does `uname -m`.
I'd be happy to see the Util-Linux version dropped. I'm not
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dubbs"
To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 5:50 AM
Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Util-linux arch command
> > ◦[randy] - Added three configure parameters to the Chapter 6
> > Util-linux-ng instructions so that additional program
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:33 +0100, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> Each configure run arch at 2 different path and look to satisfy from
> 'unknow' answer
> /bin/arch = `(/bin/arch) 2>/dev/null || echo
> unknown`
> /usr/bin/arch -k = `(/usr/bin/arch -k) 2>/dev/null |
12 matches
Mail list logo
