On 05/20/2011 03:47 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2011 17:25:15 -0500, DJ Lucas
> wrote:
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>
>>> make-aux-files.sh: Why renaming things to lsb-bootscripts? If we're
>>> migrating (which I think we should), shouldn't we just move the lsb
>>> scripts out of
On 5/21/11 2:48 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> I do plan to add a "service" script later that would alleviate the issue
> completely, as was suggested by Jeremy a few months ago, but I'm a
> little stuck as far as how to handle multi-level, conditional tab
> completions in bash, so it is on hold for a sec.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:10, Jeremy Huntwork
wrote:
> On 5/21/11 2:48 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> I do plan to add a "service" script later that would alleviate the issue
>> completely, as was suggested by Jeremy a few months ago, but I'm a
>> little stuck as far as how to handle multi-level, conditi
On 05/21/2011 07:10 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/21/11 2:48 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> I do plan to add a "service" script later that would alleviate the issue
>> completely, as was suggested by Jeremy a few months ago, but I'm a
>> little stuck as far as how to handle multi-level, conditional tab
On 05/21/2011 11:17 AM, Robert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 08:10, Jeremy Huntwork
> wrote:
>> On 5/21/11 2:48 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> I do plan to add a "service" script later that would alleviate the issue
>>> completely, as was suggested by Jeremy a few months ago, but I'm a
>>> little
DJ Lucas wrote:
> There are a couple of packages, non-obvious packages at that, that
> install their own bootscripts and they work in the current proposal
> without modifications using the lsb functions.
I must not install them, then. Alternately, I do install them, but
don't care to use their bo
On 5/21/11 12:52 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Oh, I didn't realize that it had continued beyond the new network script
> and ifup/ifdown scripts, or rather I read it as just example, not an
> actual suggestion. Give me a few minutes to run through the thread again.
I didn't actually see the new scripts.
On 5/21/11 1:20 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> The service script might work, but it's a complete re-training for me,
> and I'm a bit of a curmudgeon. That's probably not a reason to avoid
> doing it, though. :-P
The first picture that came back in google's image search for curmudgeon:
http://ameri
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/21/11 1:20 PM, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> The service script might work, but it's a complete re-training for me,
>> and I'm a bit of a curmudgeon. That's probably not a reason to avoid
>> doing it, though. :-P
>
> The first picture that came back in google's image sear
